1
Feb
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. 7 Comments
I’m not running the site for the lockout-shortened season because teams will not have many games in hand on each other during the condensed schedule. I still firmly believe in the arguments presented below. You can find a site with similar information here.
This site will return (perhaps even this season), and if all goes well it will be better than ever.
7
Apr
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment
The prior post has the regular final standings for 2011-12. This is the breakdown of every type of win/loss for each team.
|
East |
RW |
RL |
OTW |
OTL |
SOW |
SOL |
Points |
Opponents’ Points |
Total 3-Pt Games |
1 |
NY Rangers |
39 |
24 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
109 |
74 |
19 |
2 |
Pittsburgh |
40 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
108 |
73 |
17 |
3 |
Philadelphia |
37 |
26 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
103 |
80 |
19 |
4 |
Boston |
38 |
29 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
3 |
102 |
77 |
15 |
5 |
New Jersey |
32 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
4 |
102 |
84 |
22 |
6 |
Florida |
31 |
26 |
1 |
7 |
6 |
11 |
94 |
95 |
25 |
7 |
Ottawa |
30 |
31 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
92 |
93 |
21 |
8 |
Washington |
31 |
32 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
92 |
91 |
19 |
9 |
Buffalo |
27 |
32 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
89 |
98 |
23 |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
25 |
36 |
10 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
84 |
101 |
21 |
11 |
Winnipeg |
27 |
35 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
84 |
100 |
20 |
12 |
Carolina |
29 |
33 |
3 |
10 |
1 |
6 |
82 |
102 |
20 |
13 |
Toronto |
26 |
37 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
80 |
103 |
19 |
14 |
NY Islanders |
24 |
37 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
4 |
79 |
106 |
21 |
15 |
Montreal |
24 |
35 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
78 |
109 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West |
RW |
RL |
OTW |
OTL |
SOW |
SOL |
Points |
Opponents’ Points |
Total 3-Pt Games |
1 |
Vancouver |
36 |
22 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
111 |
77 |
24 |
2 |
St. Louis |
42 |
22 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
109 |
73 |
18 |
3 |
Nashville |
40 |
26 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
104 |
76 |
16 |
4 |
Detroit |
36 |
28 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
102 |
80 |
18 |
5 |
Chicago |
34 |
26 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
101 |
85 |
22 |
6 |
Phoenix |
33 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
97 |
89 |
22 |
7 |
San Jose |
31 |
29 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
5 |
96 |
90 |
22 |
8 |
Los Angeles |
31 |
27 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
95 |
93 |
24 |
9 |
Calgary |
32 |
29 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
90 |
95 |
21 |
10 |
Dallas |
31 |
35 |
4 |
1 |
7 |
4 |
89 |
91 |
16 |
11 |
Colorado |
25 |
35 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
88 |
98 |
22 |
12 |
Minnesota |
22 |
36 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
9 |
81 |
107 |
24 |
13 |
Anaheim |
29 |
36 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
80 |
101 |
17 |
14 |
Edmonton |
25 |
40 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
74 |
107 |
17 |
15 |
Columbus |
23 |
46 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
65 |
112 |
13 |
_
RW=Regulation Win
RL=Regulation Loss
OTW=Overtime Win
OTL=Overtime Loss
SOW=Shootout Wins
SOL=Shootout Losses
Opponents’ Points=the number of points opponents earned in games against that team (this number is not the same as the number of points the team failed to earn because of three point games). This number shows how difficult the team was to play from the opponents’ perspective.
Three Point Games=the number of games decided in overtime or shootout (resulting in two points to the winner and one to the loser).
31
Mar
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 4 Comments
Current as of the end of the season.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
82 |
51 |
24 |
7 |
109 |
4 |
47 |
8 |
0.665 |
0 |
109.00 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
82 |
49 |
29 |
4 |
102 |
9 |
40 |
2 |
0.622 |
3.5 |
102.00 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
82 |
38 |
26 |
18 |
94 |
6 |
32 |
1 |
0.573 |
7.5 |
94.00 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
82 |
51 |
25 |
6 |
108 |
9 |
42 |
2 |
0.659 |
0.5 |
108.00 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
82 |
47 |
26 |
9 |
103 |
4 |
43 |
6 |
0.628 |
3 |
103.00 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
82 |
48 |
28 |
6 |
102 |
12 |
36 |
4 |
0.622 |
3.5 |
102.00 |
ATL |
7 |
Washington |
82 |
42 |
32 |
8 |
92 |
4 |
38 |
7 |
0.561 |
8.5 |
92.00 |
SE |
8 |
Ottawa |
82 |
41 |
31 |
10 |
92 |
6 |
35 |
5 |
0.561 |
8.5 |
92.00 |
NE |
9 |
Buffalo |
82 |
39 |
32 |
11 |
89 |
7 |
32 |
5 |
0.543 |
10 |
89.00 |
NE |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
82 |
38 |
36 |
8 |
84 |
3 |
35 |
10 |
0.512 |
12.5 |
84.00 |
SE |
11 |
Winnipeg |
82 |
37 |
35 |
10 |
84 |
4 |
33 |
6 |
0.512 |
12.5 |
84.00 |
SE |
12 |
Carolina |
82 |
33 |
33 |
16 |
82 |
1 |
32 |
3 |
0.500 |
13.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
13 |
Toronto |
82 |
35 |
37 |
10 |
80 |
4 |
31 |
5 |
0.488 |
14.5 |
80.00 |
NE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
82 |
34 |
37 |
11 |
79 |
7 |
27 |
3 |
0.482 |
15 |
79.00 |
ATL |
15 |
Montreal |
82 |
31 |
35 |
16 |
78 |
5 |
26 |
2 |
0.476 |
15.5 |
78.00 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Vancouver |
82 |
51 |
22 |
9 |
111 |
8 |
43 |
7 |
0.677 |
0 |
111.00 |
NW |
2* |
St. Louis |
82 |
49 |
22 |
11 |
109 |
4 |
45 |
3 |
0.665 |
1 |
109.00 |
CTL |
3* |
Phoenix |
82 |
42 |
27 |
13 |
97 |
6 |
36 |
3 |
0.591 |
7 |
97.00 |
PAC |
4 |
Nashville |
82 |
48 |
26 |
8 |
104 |
5 |
43 |
3 |
0.634 |
3.5 |
104.00 |
CTL |
5 |
Detroit |
82 |
48 |
28 |
6 |
102 |
9 |
39 |
3 |
0.622 |
4.5 |
102.00 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
82 |
45 |
26 |
11 |
101 |
7 |
38 |
4 |
0.616 |
5 |
101.00 |
CTL |
7 |
San Jose |
82 |
43 |
29 |
10 |
96 |
9 |
34 |
3 |
0.585 |
7.5 |
96.00 |
PAC |
8 |
Los Angeles |
82 |
40 |
27 |
15 |
95 |
6 |
34 |
3 |
0.579 |
8 |
95.00 |
PAC |
9 |
Calgary |
82 |
37 |
29 |
16 |
90 |
3 |
34 |
2 |
0.549 |
10.5 |
90.00 |
NW |
10 |
Dallas |
82 |
42 |
35 |
5 |
89 |
7 |
35 |
4 |
0.543 |
11 |
89.00 |
PAC |
11 |
Colorado |
82 |
41 |
35 |
6 |
88 |
9 |
32 |
7 |
0.537 |
11.5 |
88.00 |
NW |
12 |
Minnesota |
82 |
35 |
36 |
11 |
81 |
11 |
24 |
2 |
0.494 |
15 |
81.00 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
82 |
34 |
36 |
12 |
80 |
3 |
31 |
2 |
0.488 |
15.5 |
80.00 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
82 |
32 |
40 |
10 |
74 |
5 |
27 |
2 |
0.451 |
18.5 |
74.00 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
82 |
29 |
46 |
7 |
65 |
4 |
25 |
2 |
0.396 |
23 |
65.00 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
410 |
501 |
0.611 |
100.20 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
410 |
441 |
0.538 |
88.20 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
410 |
436 |
0.532 |
87.20 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
410 |
457 |
0.557 |
91.40 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
410 |
481 |
0.587 |
96.20 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
410 |
444 |
0.541 |
88.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
1230 |
1378 |
0.560 |
91.87 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
1230 |
1382 |
0.562 |
92.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
24.39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_
*Note that the leaders of each division are given top-three seeds in the conference, per NHL playoff seeding rules.
SW: Shootout Wins; ROW: Regulation and Overtime Wins (i.e. non-shootout wins)**; OTW: Overtime Wins (not including shootout wins); GB: Games Back; Pace: points accumulated at end of season based on current points/game (here is a great site with weighted projections of playoff chances based on the remaining schedule for each team). For a further glossary of terms, click here.
**Per NHL rules, the first tie-breaker for teams that are tied in points and games played is the number of non-shootout wins (ROW), i.e. wins in regulation and overtime but not the shootout.
Explanation of The NHL Standings As They Should Be
This site is not an “alternative hypothetical standings” based on a dispute with the current NHL system of two points for a win, one for an overtime or shootout loss, and zero for a regulation loss (thus creating the “three-point game” for overtime finishes). As silly as that system may be, the numbers above are all based on the current NHL standings, with the same value assigned to wins (2 points), regulation losses (0 points), and overtime/shootout losses (1 point).
Even so, the order of teams in the commonly published NHL standings is flawed and misleading. Every other professional sports league standings are ordered by winning percentage. It makes more sense to order the NHL standings by points earned divided by points possible rather than simply total points, just as other leagues divide wins by wins possible rather than simply total wins. This removes the “games in hand” anomaly which gives a false impression of the best record (really, would you rather your team be 4-0-0 or 4-3-1?) and instead orders the teams by the most desirable and successful record. At the end of the season, the TrueStandings and the standings in the newspaper will be identical. It is worth noting that the NHL actually uses the percentage method to determine the order of waivers (i.e. the worst team by percentage and not by points gets the first priority in selecting a player off of waivers; see CBA Article 13.19), so even the NHL knows how the standings should be kept, but the published standings order the teams by total points regardless of games played. In MLB or NBA standings, this would be the equivalent of ordering teams by the number of wins, regardless of losses or winning percentage.
In my view, the NHL “standings” ought to show where the teams “stand” in relation to each other. No rational person would rather that their favorite team have a 4-3-1 record than a 4-0-0 record. The team with the 4-0-0 record stands in a superior position to that of the team with the 4-3-1 record. The standings provided in this website provide a better picture of where the teams stand in relation to each other based on desirability of record.
The “games back” column is just like the one the MLB and NBA standings employ to give you an idea of how far one team trails behind another. It is based on the teams’ records above or below .500. If one team is four games above .500 (i.e. four more points than games played, or four more wins than regulation losses), a team that is two games above .500 is one game back of that other team.
In the league stats, “3-pt Game Pctg.” is the percentage of NHL games which go to overtime or a shootout, resulting in a 3-point game. “True .500” is the average record (by percentage) of NHL teams. In sports leagues that don’t have a 3-point game, .500 is always average (and thus, being “above .500” in those leagues means “above average”). To be above average in the NHL, a team’s record must be better than the “True .500” listed here.
The posts are divided into weekly segments so you can scroll down and see where teams stood in prior weeks, but the most recent post is updated every night at the end of all games.
Feel free to leave any questions or comments.
25
Mar
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Updated after all games on March 31, 2012.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
78 |
50 |
21 |
7 |
107 |
4 |
46 |
8 |
0.686 |
0 |
112.49 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
78 |
46 |
28 |
4 |
96 |
8 |
38 |
2 |
0.615 |
5.5 |
100.92 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
78 |
37 |
25 |
16 |
90 |
6 |
31 |
1 |
0.577 |
8.5 |
94.62 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
78 |
48 |
24 |
6 |
102 |
9 |
39 |
2 |
0.654 |
2.5 |
107.23 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
78 |
45 |
24 |
9 |
99 |
4 |
41 |
6 |
0.635 |
4 |
104.08 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
79 |
45 |
28 |
6 |
96 |
12 |
33 |
4 |
0.608 |
6 |
99.65 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
78 |
40 |
28 |
10 |
90 |
6 |
34 |
5 |
0.577 |
8.5 |
94.62 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
79 |
40 |
31 |
8 |
88 |
4 |
36 |
7 |
0.557 |
10 |
91.34 |
SE |
9 |
Buffalo |
79 |
38 |
31 |
10 |
86 |
7 |
31 |
4 |
0.544 |
11 |
89.27 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
79 |
36 |
34 |
9 |
81 |
4 |
32 |
5 |
0.513 |
13.5 |
84.08 |
SE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
78 |
36 |
35 |
7 |
79 |
3 |
33 |
9 |
0.506 |
14 |
83.05 |
SE |
12 |
Carolina |
79 |
31 |
32 |
16 |
78 |
0 |
31 |
3 |
0.494 |
15 |
80.96 |
SE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
78 |
33 |
34 |
11 |
77 |
7 |
26 |
3 |
0.494 |
15 |
80.95 |
ATL |
14 |
Toronto |
79 |
34 |
36 |
9 |
77 |
4 |
30 |
4 |
0.487 |
15.5 |
79.92 |
NE |
15 |
Montreal |
79 |
29 |
35 |
15 |
73 |
5 |
24 |
2 |
0.462 |
17.5 |
75.77 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Vancouver |
79 |
49 |
21 |
9 |
107 |
7 |
42 |
7 |
0.677 |
0 |
111.06 |
NW |
2* |
St. Louis |
79 |
48 |
21 |
10 |
106 |
4 |
44 |
3 |
0.671 |
0.5 |
110.03 |
CTL |
3* |
Los Angeles |
79 |
39 |
27 |
13 |
91 |
6 |
33 |
3 |
0.576 |
8 |
94.46 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
78 |
46 |
27 |
5 |
97 |
7 |
39 |
3 |
0.622 |
4.5 |
101.97 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
79 |
45 |
26 |
8 |
98 |
4 |
41 |
3 |
0.620 |
4.5 |
101.72 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
79 |
44 |
26 |
9 |
97 |
6 |
38 |
4 |
0.614 |
5 |
100.68 |
CTL |
7 |
Phoenix |
79 |
39 |
27 |
13 |
91 |
6 |
33 |
3 |
0.576 |
8 |
94.46 |
PAC |
8 |
San Jose |
79 |
40 |
29 |
10 |
90 |
8 |
32 |
2 |
0.570 |
8.5 |
93.42 |
PAC |
9 |
Dallas |
79 |
42 |
32 |
5 |
89 |
7 |
35 |
4 |
0.563 |
9 |
92.38 |
PAC |
10 |
Colorado |
80 |
41 |
33 |
6 |
88 |
9 |
32 |
7 |
0.550 |
10 |
90.20 |
NW |
11 |
Calgary |
80 |
35 |
29 |
16 |
86 |
3 |
32 |
2 |
0.538 |
11 |
88.15 |
NW |
12 |
Anaheim |
78 |
33 |
34 |
11 |
77 |
3 |
30 |
1 |
0.494 |
14.5 |
80.95 |
PAC |
13 |
Minnesota |
78 |
33 |
35 |
10 |
76 |
9 |
24 |
2 |
0.487 |
15 |
79.90 |
NW |
14 |
Edmonton |
78 |
31 |
38 |
9 |
71 |
5 |
26 |
2 |
0.455 |
17.5 |
74.64 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
79 |
27 |
45 |
7 |
61 |
4 |
23 |
2 |
0.386 |
23 |
63.32 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
391 |
481 |
0.615 |
100.87 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
393 |
422 |
0.537 |
88.05 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
393 |
416 |
0.529 |
86.80 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
394 |
438 |
0.556 |
91.16 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
394 |
459 |
0.582 |
95.53 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
395 |
428 |
0.542 |
88.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
1177 |
1319 |
0.560 |
91.89 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
1183 |
1325 |
0.560 |
91.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
24.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
17
Mar
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 8 Comments
Current as of the end of action on March 24, 2012.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
75 |
47 |
21 |
7 |
101 |
4 |
43 |
8 |
0.673 |
0 |
110.43 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
74 |
43 |
28 |
3 |
89 |
8 |
35 |
2 |
0.601 |
5.5 |
98.62 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
74 |
36 |
24 |
14 |
86 |
5 |
31 |
1 |
0.581 |
7 |
95.30 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
74 |
46 |
22 |
6 |
98 |
9 |
37 |
2 |
0.662 |
1 |
108.59 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
75 |
44 |
23 |
8 |
96 |
4 |
40 |
6 |
0.640 |
2.5 |
104.96 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
75 |
42 |
27 |
6 |
90 |
11 |
31 |
4 |
0.600 |
5.5 |
98.40 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
76 |
38 |
28 |
10 |
86 |
5 |
33 |
5 |
0.566 |
8 |
92.79 |
NE |
8 |
Buffalo |
76 |
37 |
29 |
10 |
84 |
7 |
30 |
4 |
0.553 |
9 |
90.63 |
NE |
9 |
Washington |
75 |
37 |
30 |
8 |
82 |
2 |
35 |
7 |
0.547 |
9.5 |
89.65 |
SE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
75 |
35 |
32 |
8 |
78 |
4 |
31 |
4 |
0.520 |
11.5 |
85.28 |
SE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
74 |
34 |
33 |
7 |
75 |
3 |
31 |
8 |
0.507 |
12.5 |
83.11 |
SE |
12 |
Carolina |
76 |
30 |
31 |
15 |
75 |
0 |
30 |
3 |
0.493 |
13.5 |
80.92 |
SE |
13 |
Toronto |
76 |
33 |
34 |
9 |
75 |
4 |
29 |
4 |
0.493 |
13.5 |
80.92 |
NE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
74 |
30 |
33 |
11 |
71 |
6 |
24 |
3 |
0.480 |
14.5 |
78.68 |
ATL |
15 |
Montreal |
76 |
29 |
34 |
13 |
71 |
5 |
24 |
2 |
0.467 |
15.5 |
76.61 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
ROW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
St. Louis |
75 |
46 |
20 |
9 |
101 |
4 |
42 |
3 |
0.673 |
0 |
110.43 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
75 |
45 |
21 |
9 |
99 |
7 |
38 |
6 |
0.660 |
1 |
108.24 |
NW |
3* |
Dallas |
75 |
41 |
29 |
5 |
87 |
7 |
34 |
4 |
0.580 |
7 |
95.12 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
75 |
45 |
25 |
5 |
95 |
7 |
38 |
3 |
0.633 |
3 |
103.87 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
75 |
43 |
24 |
8 |
94 |
4 |
39 |
3 |
0.627 |
3.5 |
102.77 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
75 |
42 |
25 |
8 |
92 |
5 |
37 |
4 |
0.613 |
4.5 |
100.59 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
75 |
37 |
26 |
12 |
86 |
6 |
31 |
3 |
0.573 |
7.5 |
94.03 |
PAC |
8 |
San Jose |
75 |
38 |
27 |
10 |
86 |
8 |
30 |
2 |
0.573 |
7.5 |
94.03 |
PAC |
9 |
Phoenix |
76 |
37 |
26 |
13 |
87 |
6 |
31 |
3 |
0.572 |
7.5 |
93.87 |
PAC |
10 |
Colorado |
77 |
40 |
31 |
6 |
86 |
9 |
31 |
7 |
0.558 |
8.5 |
91.58 |
NW |
11 |
Calgary |
76 |
34 |
27 |
15 |
83 |
3 |
31 |
2 |
0.546 |
9.5 |
89.55 |
NW |
12 |
Anaheim |
75 |
32 |
32 |
11 |
75 |
3 |
29 |
1 |
0.500 |
13 |
82.00 |
PAC |
13 |
Minnesota |
74 |
31 |
33 |
10 |
72 |
8 |
23 |
1 |
0.486 |
14 |
79.78 |
NW |
14 |
Edmonton |
75 |
30 |
36 |
9 |
69 |
5 |
25 |
2 |
0.460 |
16 |
75.44 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
74 |
24 |
43 |
7 |
55 |
4 |
20 |
2 |
0.372 |
22.5 |
60.95 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
373 |
456 |
0.611 |
100.25 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
378 |
405 |
0.536 |
87.86 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
374 |
396 |
0.529 |
86.82 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
376 |
421 |
0.560 |
91.81 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
374 |
437 |
0.584 |
95.81 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
377 |
409 |
0.542 |
88.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
1125 |
1257 |
0.559 |
91.62 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
1127 |
1267 |
0.562 |
92.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
24.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
10
Mar
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
As of the end of action on March 17, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
71 |
44 |
20 |
7 |
95 |
3 |
41 |
7 |
0.669 |
0 |
109.72 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
71 |
41 |
27 |
3 |
85 |
8 |
33 |
2 |
0.599 |
5 |
98.17 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
71 |
35 |
23 |
13 |
83 |
5 |
30 |
1 |
0.585 |
6 |
95.86 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
70 |
44 |
21 |
5 |
93 |
9 |
35 |
2 |
0.664 |
0.5 |
108.94 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
71 |
41 |
22 |
8 |
90 |
3 |
38 |
5 |
0.634 |
2.5 |
103.94 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
72 |
41 |
26 |
5 |
87 |
11 |
30 |
4 |
0.604 |
4.5 |
99.08 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
73 |
37 |
26 |
10 |
84 |
5 |
32 |
5 |
0.575 |
6.5 |
94.36 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
71 |
36 |
29 |
6 |
78 |
2 |
34 |
7 |
0.549 |
8.5 |
90.08 |
SE |
9 |
Winnipeg |
71 |
34 |
29 |
8 |
76 |
4 |
30 |
3 |
0.535 |
9.5 |
87.77 |
SE |
10 |
Buffalo |
72 |
33 |
29 |
10 |
76 |
7 |
26 |
4 |
0.528 |
10 |
86.56 |
NE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
71 |
32 |
32 |
7 |
71 |
2 |
30 |
8 |
0.500 |
12 |
82.00 |
SE |
12 |
Toronto |
72 |
32 |
32 |
8 |
72 |
3 |
29 |
4 |
0.500 |
12 |
82.00 |
NE |
13 |
Carolina |
72 |
28 |
29 |
15 |
71 |
0 |
28 |
3 |
0.493 |
12.5 |
80.86 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
72 |
29 |
32 |
11 |
69 |
6 |
23 |
3 |
0.479 |
13.5 |
78.58 |
ATL |
15 |
Montreal |
73 |
28 |
32 |
13 |
69 |
5 |
23 |
2 |
0.473 |
14 |
77.51 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
St. Louis |
73 |
46 |
19 |
8 |
100 |
4 |
42 |
3 |
0.685 |
0 |
112.33 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
71 |
43 |
20 |
8 |
94 |
7 |
36 |
5 |
0.662 |
2 |
108.56 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
71 |
36 |
25 |
10 |
82 |
7 |
29 |
2 |
0.577 |
8 |
94.70 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
72 |
44 |
24 |
4 |
92 |
7 |
37 |
3 |
0.639 |
3.5 |
104.78 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
71 |
41 |
22 |
8 |
90 |
4 |
37 |
3 |
0.634 |
4 |
103.94 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
72 |
39 |
25 |
8 |
86 |
5 |
34 |
3 |
0.597 |
6.5 |
97.94 |
CTL |
7 |
Dallas |
72 |
39 |
28 |
5 |
83 |
6 |
33 |
4 |
0.576 |
8 |
94.53 |
PAC |
8 |
Los Angeles |
72 |
35 |
25 |
12 |
82 |
5 |
30 |
3 |
0.569 |
8.5 |
93.39 |
PAC |
9 |
Phoenix |
72 |
35 |
26 |
11 |
81 |
5 |
30 |
3 |
0.563 |
9 |
92.25 |
PAC |
10 |
Colorado |
74 |
39 |
30 |
5 |
83 |
9 |
30 |
6 |
0.561 |
9 |
91.97 |
NW |
11 |
Calgary |
72 |
34 |
26 |
12 |
80 |
3 |
31 |
2 |
0.556 |
9.5 |
91.11 |
NW |
12 |
Anaheim |
72 |
30 |
31 |
11 |
71 |
3 |
27 |
1 |
0.493 |
14 |
80.86 |
PAC |
13 |
Minnesota |
71 |
29 |
32 |
10 |
68 |
7 |
22 |
1 |
0.479 |
15 |
78.54 |
NW |
14 |
Edmonton |
71 |
28 |
36 |
7 |
63 |
4 |
24 |
2 |
0.444 |
17.5 |
72.76 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
71 |
22 |
42 |
7 |
51 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
0.359 |
23.5 |
58.90 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
356 |
434 |
0.610 |
99.97 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
361 |
386 |
0.535 |
87.68 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
356 |
379 |
0.532 |
87.30 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
359 |
399 |
0.556 |
91.14 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
359 |
419 |
0.584 |
95.70 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
359 |
388 |
0.540 |
88.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
1073 |
1199 |
0.559 |
91.63 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
1077 |
1206 |
0.560 |
91.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.72% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
3
Mar
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current as of the end of action on March 10, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
67 |
42 |
18 |
7 |
91 |
3 |
39 |
6 |
0.679 |
0 |
111.37 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
67 |
40 |
24 |
3 |
83 |
7 |
33 |
2 |
0.619 |
4 |
101.58 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
67 |
31 |
23 |
13 |
75 |
4 |
27 |
1 |
0.560 |
8 |
91.79 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
67 |
41 |
21 |
5 |
87 |
9 |
32 |
2 |
0.649 |
2 |
106.48 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
67 |
39 |
21 |
7 |
85 |
3 |
36 |
5 |
0.634 |
3 |
104.03 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
68 |
39 |
24 |
5 |
83 |
10 |
29 |
4 |
0.610 |
4.5 |
100.09 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
70 |
36 |
25 |
9 |
81 |
5 |
31 |
4 |
0.579 |
6.5 |
94.89 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
68 |
34 |
28 |
6 |
74 |
1 |
33 |
7 |
0.544 |
9 |
89.24 |
SE |
9 |
Winnipeg |
69 |
32 |
29 |
8 |
72 |
4 |
28 |
3 |
0.522 |
10.5 |
85.57 |
SE |
10 |
Buffalo |
69 |
32 |
29 |
8 |
72 |
7 |
25 |
3 |
0.522 |
10.5 |
85.57 |
NE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
68 |
31 |
30 |
7 |
69 |
2 |
29 |
8 |
0.507 |
11.5 |
83.21 |
SE |
12 |
Toronto |
68 |
30 |
30 |
8 |
68 |
3 |
27 |
4 |
0.500 |
12 |
82.00 |
NE |
13 |
Carolina |
68 |
26 |
27 |
15 |
67 |
0 |
26 |
3 |
0.493 |
12.5 |
80.79 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
68 |
28 |
31 |
9 |
65 |
5 |
23 |
3 |
0.478 |
13.5 |
78.38 |
ATL |
15 |
Montreal |
69 |
27 |
32 |
10 |
64 |
4 |
23 |
2 |
0.464 |
14.5 |
76.06 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
St. Louis |
69 |
44 |
18 |
7 |
95 |
4 |
40 |
3 |
0.688 |
0 |
112.90 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
69 |
42 |
19 |
8 |
92 |
7 |
35 |
5 |
0.667 |
1.5 |
109.33 |
NW |
3* |
Dallas |
69 |
38 |
26 |
5 |
81 |
6 |
32 |
4 |
0.587 |
7 |
96.26 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
69 |
44 |
22 |
3 |
91 |
7 |
37 |
3 |
0.659 |
2 |
108.14 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
68 |
40 |
21 |
7 |
87 |
3 |
37 |
3 |
0.640 |
3.5 |
104.91 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
69 |
37 |
25 |
7 |
81 |
4 |
33 |
3 |
0.587 |
7 |
96.26 |
CTL |
7 |
Phoenix |
69 |
34 |
25 |
10 |
78 |
5 |
29 |
3 |
0.565 |
8.5 |
92.70 |
PAC |
8 |
San Jose |
67 |
33 |
25 |
9 |
75 |
6 |
27 |
1 |
0.560 |
9 |
91.79 |
PAC |
9 |
Calgary |
68 |
31 |
25 |
12 |
74 |
3 |
28 |
1 |
0.544 |
10 |
89.24 |
NW |
10 |
Los Angeles |
68 |
31 |
25 |
12 |
74 |
4 |
27 |
3 |
0.544 |
10 |
89.24 |
PAC |
11 |
Colorado |
70 |
36 |
30 |
4 |
76 |
8 |
28 |
5 |
0.543 |
10 |
89.03 |
NW |
12 |
Minnesota |
68 |
29 |
29 |
10 |
68 |
7 |
22 |
1 |
0.500 |
13 |
82.00 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
69 |
29 |
30 |
10 |
68 |
3 |
26 |
1 |
0.493 |
13.5 |
80.81 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
68 |
26 |
35 |
7 |
59 |
4 |
22 |
2 |
0.434 |
17.5 |
71.15 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
68 |
22 |
39 |
7 |
51 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
0.375 |
21.5 |
61.50 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
337 |
411 |
0.610 |
100.01 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
343 |
368 |
0.536 |
87.98 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
340 |
357 |
0.525 |
86.10 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
342 |
376 |
0.550 |
90.15 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
343 |
405 |
0.590 |
96.82 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
343 |
369 |
0.538 |
88.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
1020 |
1136 |
0.557 |
91.33 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
1028 |
1150 |
0.559 |
91.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
25
Feb
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 1 Comment
Current as of the end of action on March 3, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
63 |
41 |
15 |
7 |
89 |
3 |
38 |
6 |
0.706 |
0 |
115.84 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
63 |
38 |
22 |
3 |
79 |
7 |
31 |
2 |
0.627 |
5 |
102.83 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
64 |
30 |
22 |
12 |
72 |
4 |
26 |
1 |
0.563 |
9 |
92.25 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
64 |
38 |
21 |
5 |
81 |
8 |
30 |
2 |
0.633 |
4.5 |
103.78 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
63 |
35 |
21 |
7 |
77 |
2 |
33 |
5 |
0.611 |
6 |
100.22 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
64 |
36 |
23 |
5 |
77 |
10 |
26 |
4 |
0.602 |
6.5 |
98.66 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
66 |
34 |
24 |
8 |
76 |
5 |
29 |
4 |
0.576 |
8 |
94.42 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
64 |
32 |
27 |
5 |
69 |
1 |
31 |
6 |
0.539 |
10.5 |
88.41 |
SE |
9 |
Winnipeg |
66 |
31 |
27 |
8 |
70 |
4 |
27 |
3 |
0.530 |
11 |
86.97 |
SE |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
65 |
31 |
28 |
6 |
68 |
2 |
29 |
8 |
0.523 |
11.5 |
85.78 |
SE |
11 |
Buffalo |
65 |
30 |
27 |
8 |
68 |
6 |
24 |
2 |
0.523 |
11.5 |
85.78 |
NE |
12 |
Toronto |
65 |
30 |
28 |
7 |
67 |
3 |
27 |
4 |
0.515 |
12 |
84.52 |
NE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
65 |
27 |
29 |
9 |
63 |
5 |
22 |
3 |
0.485 |
14 |
79.48 |
ATL |
14 |
Carolina |
65 |
24 |
27 |
14 |
62 |
0 |
24 |
2 |
0.477 |
14.5 |
78.22 |
SE |
15 |
Montreal |
66 |
25 |
31 |
10 |
60 |
4 |
21 |
2 |
0.455 |
16 |
74.55 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
65 |
43 |
19 |
3 |
89 |
7 |
36 |
3 |
0.685 |
0 |
112.28 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
66 |
41 |
17 |
8 |
90 |
7 |
34 |
5 |
0.682 |
0 |
111.82 |
NW |
3* |
Phoenix |
65 |
33 |
23 |
9 |
75 |
5 |
28 |
3 |
0.577 |
7 |
94.62 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
66 |
41 |
18 |
7 |
89 |
4 |
37 |
3 |
0.674 |
0.5 |
110.58 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
65 |
38 |
20 |
7 |
83 |
3 |
35 |
3 |
0.638 |
3 |
104.71 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
66 |
35 |
24 |
7 |
77 |
4 |
31 |
3 |
0.583 |
6.5 |
95.67 |
CTL |
7 |
San Jose |
64 |
33 |
24 |
7 |
73 |
6 |
27 |
1 |
0.570 |
7.5 |
93.53 |
PAC |
8 |
Dallas |
65 |
34 |
26 |
5 |
73 |
4 |
30 |
4 |
0.562 |
8 |
92.09 |
PAC |
9 |
Los Angeles |
65 |
30 |
23 |
12 |
72 |
4 |
26 |
3 |
0.554 |
8.5 |
90.83 |
PAC |
10 |
Calgary |
65 |
29 |
25 |
11 |
69 |
3 |
26 |
1 |
0.531 |
10 |
87.05 |
NW |
11 |
Colorado |
66 |
33 |
29 |
4 |
70 |
7 |
26 |
5 |
0.530 |
10 |
86.97 |
NW |
12 |
Minnesota |
65 |
28 |
27 |
10 |
66 |
6 |
22 |
1 |
0.508 |
11.5 |
83.26 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
66 |
28 |
28 |
10 |
66 |
3 |
25 |
1 |
0.500 |
12 |
82.00 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
64 |
25 |
33 |
6 |
56 |
3 |
22 |
2 |
0.438 |
16 |
71.75 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
65 |
20 |
38 |
7 |
47 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
0.362 |
21 |
59.29 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
319 |
387 |
0.607 |
99.48 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
325 |
350 |
0.538 |
88.31 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
324 |
341 |
0.526 |
86.30 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
325 |
359 |
0.552 |
90.58 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
327 |
385 |
0.589 |
96.54 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
326 |
351 |
0.538 |
88.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
968 |
1078 |
0.557 |
91.32 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
978 |
1095 |
0.560 |
91.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
18
Feb
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 2 Comments
Current as of the end action on February 25, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
60 |
39 |
15 |
6 |
84 |
3 |
36 |
6 |
0.700 |
0 |
114.80 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
60 |
37 |
20 |
3 |
77 |
7 |
30 |
1 |
0.642 |
3.5 |
105.23 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
60 |
28 |
20 |
12 |
68 |
4 |
24 |
1 |
0.567 |
8 |
92.93 |
SE |
4 |
New Jersey |
60 |
35 |
21 |
4 |
74 |
10 |
25 |
4 |
0.617 |
5 |
101.13 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
61 |
34 |
20 |
7 |
75 |
2 |
32 |
5 |
0.615 |
5 |
100.82 |
ATL |
6 |
Pittsburgh |
61 |
35 |
21 |
5 |
75 |
7 |
28 |
2 |
0.615 |
5 |
100.82 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
63 |
32 |
23 |
8 |
72 |
5 |
27 |
4 |
0.571 |
7.5 |
93.71 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
62 |
31 |
26 |
5 |
67 |
1 |
30 |
5 |
0.540 |
9.5 |
88.61 |
SE |
9 |
Winnipeg |
64 |
30 |
26 |
8 |
68 |
4 |
26 |
3 |
0.531 |
10 |
87.13 |
SE |
10 |
Toronto |
62 |
29 |
26 |
7 |
65 |
3 |
26 |
4 |
0.524 |
10.5 |
85.97 |
NE |
11 |
Buffalo |
62 |
27 |
27 |
8 |
62 |
6 |
21 |
2 |
0.500 |
12 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Tampa Bay |
61 |
27 |
28 |
6 |
60 |
2 |
25 |
6 |
0.492 |
12.5 |
80.66 |
SE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
61 |
26 |
27 |
8 |
60 |
5 |
21 |
3 |
0.492 |
12.5 |
80.66 |
ATL |
14 |
Carolina |
62 |
23 |
26 |
13 |
59 |
0 |
23 |
2 |
0.476 |
13.5 |
78.03 |
SE |
15 |
Montreal |
62 |
24 |
28 |
10 |
58 |
3 |
21 |
2 |
0.468 |
14 |
76.71 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Vancouver |
62 |
40 |
16 |
6 |
86 |
7 |
33 |
5 |
0.694 |
0 |
113.74 |
NW |
2* |
Detroit |
63 |
41 |
19 |
3 |
85 |
7 |
34 |
3 |
0.675 |
1 |
110.63 |
CTL |
3* |
San Jose |
60 |
32 |
21 |
7 |
71 |
6 |
26 |
1 |
0.592 |
6.5 |
97.03 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
62 |
38 |
17 |
7 |
83 |
4 |
34 |
3 |
0.669 |
1.5 |
109.77 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
62 |
36 |
19 |
7 |
79 |
3 |
33 |
3 |
0.637 |
3.5 |
104.48 |
CTL |
6 |
Phoenix |
62 |
32 |
21 |
9 |
73 |
4 |
28 |
3 |
0.589 |
6.5 |
96.55 |
PAC |
7 |
Chicago |
63 |
33 |
23 |
7 |
73 |
4 |
29 |
3 |
0.579 |
7 |
95.02 |
CTL |
8 |
Dallas |
62 |
32 |
26 |
4 |
68 |
4 |
28 |
3 |
0.548 |
9 |
89.94 |
PAC |
9 |
Los Angeles |
62 |
28 |
22 |
12 |
68 |
4 |
24 |
3 |
0.548 |
9 |
89.94 |
PAC |
10 |
Calgary |
62 |
28 |
23 |
11 |
67 |
3 |
25 |
1 |
0.540 |
9.5 |
88.61 |
NW |
11 |
Colorado |
63 |
32 |
27 |
4 |
68 |
7 |
25 |
5 |
0.540 |
9.5 |
88.51 |
NW |
12 |
Minnesota |
61 |
27 |
25 |
9 |
63 |
6 |
21 |
1 |
0.516 |
11 |
84.69 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
61 |
26 |
25 |
10 |
62 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
0.508 |
11.5 |
83.34 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
61 |
24 |
31 |
6 |
54 |
3 |
21 |
2 |
0.443 |
15.5 |
72.59 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
61 |
18 |
36 |
7 |
43 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
0.352 |
21 |
57.80 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
303 |
368 |
0.607 |
99.59 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
309 |
334 |
0.540 |
88.63 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
309 |
322 |
0.521 |
85.45 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
307 |
342 |
0.557 |
91.35 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
311 |
363 |
0.584 |
95.71 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
309 |
338 |
0.547 |
89.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
921 |
1024 |
0.556 |
91.17 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
927 |
1043 |
0.563 |
92.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
11
Feb
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 3 Comments
Current as of the end of action on February 18, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
56 |
37 |
14 |
5 |
79 |
3 |
34 |
4 |
0.705 |
0 |
115.68 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
56 |
35 |
19 |
2 |
72 |
7 |
28 |
1 |
0.643 |
3.5 |
105.43 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
57 |
27 |
19 |
11 |
65 |
3 |
24 |
1 |
0.570 |
7.5 |
93.51 |
SE |
4 |
New Jersey |
57 |
33 |
20 |
4 |
70 |
10 |
23 |
3 |
0.614 |
5 |
100.70 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
58 |
32 |
19 |
7 |
71 |
1 |
31 |
4 |
0.612 |
5 |
100.38 |
ATL |
6 |
Pittsburgh |
58 |
33 |
20 |
5 |
71 |
7 |
26 |
2 |
0.612 |
5 |
100.38 |
ATL |
7 |
Ottawa |
60 |
30 |
22 |
8 |
68 |
5 |
25 |
4 |
0.567 |
7.5 |
92.93 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
58 |
29 |
24 |
5 |
63 |
1 |
28 |
5 |
0.543 |
9 |
89.07 |
SE |
9 |
Toronto |
59 |
29 |
24 |
6 |
64 |
3 |
26 |
4 |
0.542 |
9 |
88.95 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
60 |
28 |
26 |
6 |
62 |
4 |
24 |
3 |
0.517 |
10.5 |
84.73 |
SE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
58 |
26 |
26 |
6 |
58 |
2 |
24 |
6 |
0.500 |
11.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
12 |
NY Islanders |
58 |
25 |
25 |
8 |
58 |
4 |
21 |
3 |
0.500 |
11.5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
13 |
Montreal |
59 |
24 |
25 |
10 |
58 |
3 |
21 |
2 |
0.492 |
12 |
80.61 |
NE |
14 |
Buffalo |
58 |
24 |
27 |
7 |
55 |
5 |
19 |
2 |
0.474 |
13 |
77.76 |
NE |
15 |
Carolina |
59 |
22 |
26 |
11 |
55 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
0.466 |
13.5 |
76.44 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
59 |
40 |
17 |
2 |
82 |
7 |
33 |
3 |
0.695 |
0 |
113.97 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
58 |
37 |
15 |
6 |
80 |
6 |
31 |
5 |
0.690 |
0.5 |
113.10 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
56 |
31 |
18 |
7 |
69 |
6 |
25 |
1 |
0.616 |
5 |
101.04 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
58 |
36 |
15 |
7 |
79 |
2 |
34 |
3 |
0.681 |
1 |
111.69 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
58 |
33 |
19 |
6 |
72 |
3 |
30 |
3 |
0.621 |
4.5 |
101.79 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
59 |
31 |
21 |
7 |
69 |
4 |
27 |
3 |
0.585 |
6.5 |
95.90 |
CTL |
7 |
Phoenix |
59 |
29 |
21 |
9 |
67 |
2 |
27 |
3 |
0.568 |
7.5 |
93.12 |
PAC |
8 |
Calgary |
59 |
28 |
22 |
9 |
65 |
3 |
25 |
1 |
0.551 |
8.5 |
90.34 |
NW |
9 |
Los Angeles |
59 |
27 |
21 |
11 |
65 |
4 |
23 |
3 |
0.551 |
8.5 |
90.34 |
PAC |
10 |
Dallas |
58 |
29 |
25 |
4 |
62 |
4 |
25 |
3 |
0.534 |
9.5 |
87.66 |
PAC |
11 |
Colorado |
59 |
29 |
26 |
4 |
62 |
7 |
22 |
5 |
0.525 |
10 |
86.17 |
NW |
12 |
Minnesota |
58 |
25 |
24 |
9 |
59 |
5 |
20 |
1 |
0.509 |
11 |
83.41 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
58 |
24 |
24 |
10 |
58 |
2 |
22 |
1 |
0.500 |
11.5 |
82.00 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
57 |
22 |
29 |
6 |
50 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
0.439 |
15 |
71.93 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
58 |
17 |
35 |
6 |
40 |
3 |
14 |
2 |
0.345 |
20.5 |
56.55 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
287 |
349 |
0.608 |
99.71 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
292 |
317 |
0.543 |
89.02 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
292 |
303 |
0.519 |
85.09 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
290 |
321 |
0.553 |
90.77 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
292 |
342 |
0.586 |
96.04 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
291 |
316 |
0.543 |
89.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
871 |
969 |
0.556 |
91.23 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
873 |
979 |
0.561 |
91.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
4
Feb
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 7 Comments
Current as of the end of action on February 11, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
53 |
35 |
13 |
5 |
75 |
3 |
32 |
4 |
0.708 |
0 |
116.04 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
53 |
34 |
17 |
2 |
70 |
6 |
28 |
1 |
0.660 |
2.5 |
108.30 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
54 |
26 |
17 |
11 |
63 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
0.583 |
6.5 |
95.67 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
55 |
31 |
17 |
7 |
69 |
1 |
30 |
4 |
0.627 |
4 |
102.87 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
55 |
31 |
19 |
5 |
67 |
7 |
24 |
2 |
0.609 |
5 |
99.89 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
55 |
31 |
20 |
4 |
66 |
9 |
22 |
3 |
0.600 |
5.5 |
98.40 |
ATL |
7 |
Washington |
54 |
28 |
21 |
5 |
61 |
1 |
27 |
5 |
0.565 |
7.5 |
92.63 |
SE |
8 |
Toronto |
56 |
28 |
22 |
6 |
62 |
3 |
25 |
3 |
0.554 |
8 |
90.79 |
NE |
9 |
Ottawa |
58 |
28 |
22 |
8 |
64 |
5 |
23 |
4 |
0.552 |
8 |
90.48 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
57 |
26 |
25 |
6 |
58 |
3 |
23 |
3 |
0.509 |
10.5 |
83.44 |
SE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
54 |
24 |
24 |
6 |
54 |
2 |
22 |
5 |
0.500 |
11 |
82.00 |
SE |
12 |
NY Islanders |
54 |
23 |
23 |
8 |
54 |
4 |
19 |
3 |
0.500 |
11 |
82.00 |
ATL |
13 |
Montreal |
56 |
23 |
24 |
9 |
55 |
2 |
21 |
2 |
0.491 |
11.5 |
80.54 |
NE |
14 |
Buffalo |
55 |
24 |
25 |
6 |
54 |
5 |
19 |
2 |
0.491 |
11.5 |
80.51 |
NE |
15 |
Carolina |
56 |
20 |
25 |
11 |
51 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
0.455 |
13.5 |
74.68 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
OTW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
56 |
37 |
17 |
2 |
76 |
7 |
30 |
3 |
0.679 |
0 |
111.29 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
55 |
34 |
15 |
6 |
74 |
5 |
29 |
5 |
0.673 |
0.5 |
110.33 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
52 |
30 |
16 |
6 |
66 |
6 |
24 |
1 |
0.635 |
3 |
104.08 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
54 |
33 |
14 |
7 |
73 |
2 |
31 |
3 |
0.676 |
0.5 |
110.85 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
56 |
32 |
18 |
6 |
70 |
3 |
29 |
3 |
0.625 |
3 |
102.50 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
56 |
29 |
20 |
7 |
65 |
4 |
25 |
3 |
0.580 |
5.5 |
95.18 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
56 |
26 |
19 |
11 |
63 |
4 |
22 |
3 |
0.563 |
6.5 |
92.25 |
PAC |
8 |
Phoenix |
56 |
27 |
21 |
8 |
62 |
2 |
25 |
2 |
0.554 |
7 |
90.79 |
PAC |
9 |
Dallas |
54 |
28 |
23 |
3 |
59 |
4 |
24 |
2 |
0.546 |
7.5 |
89.59 |
PAC |
10 |
Calgary |
56 |
26 |
22 |
8 |
60 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
0.536 |
8 |
87.86 |
NW |
11 |
Minnesota |
55 |
25 |
22 |
8 |
58 |
5 |
20 |
1 |
0.527 |
8.5 |
86.47 |
NW |
12 |
Colorado |
57 |
28 |
25 |
4 |
60 |
7 |
21 |
5 |
0.526 |
8.5 |
86.32 |
NW |
13 |
Anaheim |
54 |
21 |
24 |
9 |
51 |
2 |
19 |
1 |
0.472 |
11.5 |
77.44 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
55 |
22 |
28 |
5 |
49 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
0.445 |
13 |
73.05 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
55 |
16 |
33 |
6 |
38 |
3 |
13 |
2 |
0.345 |
18.5 |
56.65 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
272 |
331 |
0.608 |
99.79 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
278 |
305 |
0.549 |
89.96 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
275 |
287 |
0.522 |
85.58 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
272 |
301 |
0.553 |
90.74 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
277 |
322 |
0.581 |
95.32 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
278 |
301 |
0.541 |
88.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
825 |
923 |
0.559 |
91.74 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
827 |
924 |
0.559 |
91.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
23.61% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
29
Jan
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Updated at the end of action on February 4, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
49 |
32 |
12 |
5 |
69 |
3 |
29 |
0.704 |
0 |
115.47 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
50 |
32 |
16 |
2 |
66 |
5 |
27 |
0.660 |
2 |
108.24 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
51 |
24 |
16 |
11 |
59 |
3 |
21 |
0.578 |
6 |
94.86 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
51 |
30 |
15 |
6 |
66 |
1 |
29 |
0.647 |
2.5 |
106.12 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
52 |
30 |
18 |
4 |
64 |
7 |
23 |
0.615 |
4 |
100.92 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
51 |
29 |
19 |
3 |
61 |
9 |
20 |
0.598 |
5 |
98.08 |
ATL |
7 |
Toronto |
52 |
27 |
19 |
6 |
60 |
3 |
24 |
0.577 |
6 |
94.62 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
51 |
27 |
20 |
4 |
58 |
1 |
26 |
0.569 |
6.5 |
93.25 |
SE |
9 |
Ottawa |
55 |
27 |
21 |
7 |
61 |
5 |
22 |
0.555 |
7 |
90.95 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
53 |
24 |
23 |
6 |
54 |
2 |
22 |
0.509 |
9.5 |
83.55 |
SE |
11 |
Tampa Bay |
51 |
23 |
23 |
5 |
51 |
2 |
21 |
0.500 |
10 |
82.00 |
SE |
12 |
NY Islanders |
51 |
21 |
22 |
8 |
50 |
3 |
18 |
0.490 |
10.5 |
80.39 |
ATL |
13 |
Buffalo |
52 |
22 |
24 |
6 |
50 |
4 |
18 |
0.481 |
11 |
78.85 |
NE |
14 |
Carolina |
54 |
20 |
25 |
9 |
49 |
0 |
20 |
0.454 |
12.5 |
74.41 |
SE |
15 |
Montreal |
52 |
19 |
24 |
9 |
47 |
1 |
18 |
0.452 |
12.5 |
74.12 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
53 |
35 |
16 |
2 |
72 |
6 |
29 |
0.679 |
0 |
111.40 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
52 |
32 |
15 |
5 |
69 |
4 |
28 |
0.663 |
1 |
108.81 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
50 |
29 |
15 |
6 |
64 |
6 |
23 |
0.640 |
2.5 |
104.96 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
51 |
30 |
14 |
7 |
67 |
1 |
29 |
0.657 |
1.5 |
107.73 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
53 |
32 |
17 |
4 |
68 |
3 |
29 |
0.642 |
2 |
105.21 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
53 |
29 |
17 |
7 |
65 |
4 |
25 |
0.613 |
3.5 |
100.57 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
53 |
25 |
18 |
10 |
60 |
4 |
21 |
0.566 |
6 |
92.83 |
PAC |
8 |
Minnesota |
52 |
25 |
19 |
8 |
58 |
5 |
20 |
0.558 |
6.5 |
91.46 |
NW |
9 |
Dallas |
51 |
27 |
22 |
2 |
56 |
4 |
23 |
0.549 |
7 |
90.04 |
PAC |
10 |
Calgary |
52 |
24 |
22 |
6 |
54 |
2 |
22 |
0.519 |
8.5 |
85.15 |
NW |
11 |
Phoenix |
52 |
23 |
21 |
8 |
54 |
2 |
21 |
0.519 |
8.5 |
85.15 |
PAC |
12 |
Colorado |
54 |
26 |
25 |
3 |
55 |
7 |
19 |
0.509 |
9 |
83.52 |
NW |
13 |
Edmonton |
52 |
21 |
26 |
5 |
47 |
3 |
18 |
0.452 |
12 |
74.12 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
51 |
19 |
24 |
8 |
46 |
1 |
18 |
0.451 |
12 |
73.96 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
52 |
14 |
32 |
6 |
34 |
3 |
11 |
0.327 |
18.5 |
53.62 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
254 |
310 |
0.610 |
100.08 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
261 |
284 |
0.544 |
89.23 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
260 |
271 |
0.521 |
85.47 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
257 |
280 |
0.545 |
89.34 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
262 |
306 |
0.584 |
95.77 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
262 |
283 |
0.540 |
88.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
775 |
865 |
0.558 |
91.52 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
781 |
869 |
0.556 |
91.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
22.88% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
21
Jan
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 1 Comment
Current as of the All Star Break (beginning January 26, 2012).
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
47 |
31 |
12 |
4 |
66 |
2 |
29 |
0.702 |
0 |
115.15 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
47 |
31 |
14 |
2 |
64 |
5 |
26 |
0.681 |
1 |
111.66 |
NE |
3* |
Washington |
48 |
26 |
19 |
3 |
55 |
1 |
25 |
0.573 |
6 |
93.96 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
48 |
29 |
14 |
5 |
63 |
1 |
28 |
0.656 |
2 |
107.63 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
49 |
28 |
17 |
4 |
60 |
6 |
22 |
0.612 |
4 |
100.41 |
ATL |
6 |
Ottawa |
52 |
27 |
19 |
6 |
60 |
5 |
22 |
0.577 |
5.5 |
94.62 |
NE |
7 |
Florida |
48 |
22 |
15 |
11 |
55 |
3 |
19 |
0.573 |
6 |
93.96 |
SE |
8 |
New Jersey |
48 |
26 |
19 |
3 |
55 |
8 |
18 |
0.573 |
6 |
93.96 |
ATL |
9 |
Toronto |
49 |
25 |
19 |
5 |
55 |
3 |
22 |
0.561 |
6.5 |
92.04 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
50 |
22 |
22 |
6 |
50 |
1 |
21 |
0.500 |
9.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
11 |
Montreal |
49 |
19 |
21 |
9 |
47 |
1 |
18 |
0.480 |
10.5 |
78.65 |
NE |
12 |
Tampa Bay |
48 |
21 |
23 |
4 |
46 |
2 |
19 |
0.479 |
10.5 |
78.58 |
SE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
48 |
19 |
22 |
7 |
45 |
3 |
16 |
0.469 |
11 |
76.88 |
ATL |
14 |
Buffalo |
49 |
20 |
24 |
5 |
45 |
3 |
17 |
0.459 |
11.5 |
75.31 |
NE |
15 |
Carolina |
51 |
18 |
24 |
9 |
45 |
0 |
18 |
0.441 |
12.5 |
72.35 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
50 |
33 |
16 |
1 |
67 |
5 |
28 |
0.670 |
0 |
109.88 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
49 |
30 |
15 |
4 |
64 |
3 |
27 |
0.653 |
1 |
107.10 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
47 |
27 |
14 |
6 |
60 |
6 |
21 |
0.638 |
2 |
104.68 |
PAC |
4 |
St. Louis |
49 |
29 |
13 |
7 |
65 |
1 |
28 |
0.663 |
0.5 |
108.78 |
CTL |
5 |
Nashville |
50 |
30 |
16 |
4 |
64 |
3 |
27 |
0.640 |
1.5 |
104.96 |
CTL |
6 |
Chicago |
50 |
29 |
15 |
6 |
64 |
4 |
25 |
0.640 |
1.5 |
104.96 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
50 |
24 |
16 |
10 |
58 |
4 |
20 |
0.580 |
4.5 |
95.12 |
PAC |
8 |
Minnesota |
49 |
24 |
18 |
7 |
55 |
5 |
19 |
0.561 |
5.5 |
92.04 |
NW |
9 |
Dallas |
48 |
25 |
21 |
2 |
52 |
3 |
22 |
0.542 |
6.5 |
88.83 |
PAC |
10 |
Colorado |
51 |
26 |
23 |
2 |
54 |
7 |
19 |
0.529 |
7 |
86.82 |
NW |
11 |
Calgary |
50 |
23 |
21 |
6 |
52 |
2 |
21 |
0.520 |
7.5 |
85.28 |
NW |
12 |
Phoenix |
50 |
22 |
20 |
8 |
52 |
2 |
20 |
0.520 |
7.5 |
85.28 |
PAC |
13 |
Anaheim |
48 |
18 |
23 |
7 |
43 |
1 |
17 |
0.448 |
11 |
73.46 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
49 |
18 |
26 |
5 |
41 |
2 |
16 |
0.418 |
12.5 |
68.61 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
49 |
13 |
30 |
6 |
32 |
3 |
10 |
0.327 |
17 |
53.55 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
240 |
289 |
0.602 |
98.74 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
246 |
271 |
0.551 |
90.33 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
245 |
251 |
0.512 |
84.01 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
243 |
265 |
0.545 |
89.42 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
248 |
292 |
0.589 |
96.55 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
248 |
266 |
0.536 |
87.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
731 |
811 |
0.555 |
90.97 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
739 |
823 |
0.557 |
91.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
22.31% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
14
Jan
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 5 Comments
Updated at the end of action on January 21, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
46 |
30 |
12 |
4 |
64 |
2 |
28 |
0.696 |
0 |
114.09 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
45 |
30 |
13 |
2 |
62 |
4 |
26 |
0.689 |
0.5 |
112.98 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
47 |
22 |
15 |
10 |
54 |
3 |
19 |
0.574 |
5.5 |
94.21 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
46 |
28 |
14 |
4 |
60 |
0 |
28 |
0.652 |
2 |
106.96 |
ATL |
5 |
Ottawa |
50 |
27 |
17 |
6 |
60 |
5 |
22 |
0.600 |
4 |
98.40 |
NE |
6 |
Pittsburgh |
47 |
26 |
17 |
4 |
56 |
5 |
21 |
0.596 |
4.5 |
97.70 |
ATL |
7 |
New Jersey |
47 |
26 |
19 |
2 |
54 |
8 |
18 |
0.574 |
5.5 |
94.21 |
ATL |
8 |
Washington |
46 |
25 |
19 |
2 |
52 |
1 |
24 |
0.565 |
6 |
92.70 |
SE |
9 |
Toronto |
47 |
23 |
19 |
5 |
51 |
3 |
20 |
0.543 |
7 |
88.98 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
48 |
22 |
20 |
6 |
50 |
1 |
21 |
0.521 |
8 |
85.42 |
SE |
11 |
NY Islanders |
46 |
19 |
21 |
6 |
44 |
3 |
16 |
0.478 |
10 |
78.43 |
ATL |
12 |
Montreal |
48 |
18 |
21 |
9 |
45 |
1 |
17 |
0.469 |
10.5 |
76.88 |
NE |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
47 |
20 |
23 |
4 |
44 |
2 |
18 |
0.468 |
10.5 |
76.77 |
SE |
14 |
Buffalo |
48 |
19 |
24 |
5 |
43 |
2 |
17 |
0.448 |
11.5 |
73.46 |
NE |
15 |
Carolina |
50 |
17 |
24 |
9 |
43 |
0 |
17 |
0.430 |
12.5 |
70.52 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
St. Louis |
47 |
29 |
12 |
6 |
64 |
1 |
28 |
0.681 |
0 |
111.66 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
48 |
29 |
15 |
4 |
62 |
2 |
27 |
0.646 |
1.5 |
105.92 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
45 |
26 |
14 |
5 |
57 |
6 |
20 |
0.633 |
2.5 |
103.87 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
48 |
32 |
15 |
1 |
65 |
5 |
27 |
0.677 |
0 |
111.04 |
CTL |
5 |
Chicago |
49 |
29 |
14 |
6 |
64 |
4 |
25 |
0.653 |
1 |
107.10 |
CTL |
6 |
Nashville |
48 |
28 |
16 |
4 |
60 |
3 |
25 |
0.625 |
2.5 |
102.50 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
49 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
56 |
4 |
19 |
0.571 |
5 |
93.71 |
PAC |
8 |
Minnesota |
48 |
23 |
18 |
7 |
53 |
5 |
18 |
0.552 |
6 |
90.54 |
NW |
9 |
Colorado |
49 |
26 |
21 |
2 |
54 |
7 |
19 |
0.551 |
6 |
90.37 |
NW |
10 |
Dallas |
47 |
24 |
21 |
2 |
50 |
3 |
21 |
0.532 |
7 |
87.23 |
PAC |
11 |
Calgary |
49 |
23 |
20 |
6 |
52 |
2 |
21 |
0.531 |
7 |
87.02 |
NW |
12 |
Phoenix |
49 |
21 |
20 |
8 |
50 |
2 |
19 |
0.510 |
8 |
83.67 |
PAC |
13 |
Anaheim |
46 |
17 |
22 |
7 |
41 |
1 |
16 |
0.446 |
11 |
73.09 |
PAC |
14 |
Edmonton |
47 |
17 |
26 |
4 |
38 |
1 |
16 |
0.404 |
13 |
66.30 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
47 |
13 |
28 |
6 |
32 |
3 |
10 |
0.340 |
16 |
55.83 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
232 |
278 |
0.599 |
98.26 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
238 |
261 |
0.548 |
89.92 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
238 |
243 |
0.511 |
83.72 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
236 |
254 |
0.538 |
88.25 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
239 |
285 |
0.596 |
97.78 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
241 |
259 |
0.537 |
88.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
708 |
782 |
0.552 |
90.57 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
716 |
798 |
0.557 |
91.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
21.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
7
Jan
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current as of the end of action on January 14, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
42 |
28 |
10 |
4 |
60 |
2 |
26 |
0.714 |
0 |
117.14 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
41 |
28 |
12 |
1 |
57 |
3 |
25 |
0.695 |
1 |
114.00 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
43 |
21 |
14 |
8 |
50 |
2 |
19 |
0.581 |
5.5 |
95.35 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
43 |
26 |
13 |
4 |
56 |
0 |
26 |
0.651 |
2.5 |
106.79 |
ATL |
5 |
Ottawa |
46 |
25 |
15 |
6 |
56 |
5 |
20 |
0.609 |
4 |
99.83 |
NE |
6 |
New Jersey |
44 |
25 |
17 |
2 |
52 |
8 |
17 |
0.591 |
5 |
96.91 |
ATL |
7 |
Washington |
42 |
23 |
17 |
2 |
48 |
1 |
22 |
0.571 |
6 |
93.71 |
SE |
8 |
Pittsburgh |
43 |
22 |
17 |
4 |
48 |
3 |
19 |
0.558 |
6.5 |
91.53 |
ATL |
9 |
Toronto |
44 |
22 |
17 |
5 |
49 |
3 |
19 |
0.557 |
6.5 |
91.32 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
44 |
20 |
19 |
5 |
45 |
1 |
19 |
0.511 |
8.5 |
83.86 |
SE |
11 |
Buffalo |
44 |
19 |
20 |
5 |
43 |
2 |
17 |
0.489 |
9.5 |
80.14 |
NE |
12 |
Montreal |
44 |
16 |
20 |
8 |
40 |
1 |
15 |
0.455 |
11 |
74.55 |
NE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
42 |
16 |
20 |
6 |
38 |
3 |
13 |
0.452 |
11 |
74.19 |
ATL |
14 |
Tampa Bay |
43 |
17 |
22 |
4 |
38 |
2 |
15 |
0.442 |
12 |
72.47 |
SE |
15 |
Carolina |
46 |
16 |
23 |
7 |
39 |
0 |
16 |
0.424 |
13 |
69.52 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
San Jose |
41 |
25 |
11 |
5 |
55 |
5 |
20 |
0.671 |
0 |
110.00 |
PAC |
2* |
St. Louis |
44 |
26 |
12 |
6 |
58 |
1 |
25 |
0.659 |
0 |
108.09 |
CTL |
3* |
Vancouver |
45 |
28 |
14 |
3 |
59 |
2 |
26 |
0.656 |
0 |
107.51 |
NW |
4 |
Detroit |
44 |
28 |
15 |
1 |
57 |
2 |
26 |
0.648 |
0.5 |
106.23 |
CTL |
5 |
Chicago |
45 |
26 |
13 |
6 |
58 |
4 |
22 |
0.644 |
0.5 |
105.69 |
CTL |
6 |
Nashville |
44 |
25 |
15 |
4 |
54 |
3 |
22 |
0.614 |
2 |
100.64 |
CTL |
7 |
Los Angeles |
45 |
22 |
15 |
8 |
52 |
3 |
19 |
0.578 |
3.5 |
94.76 |
PAC |
8 |
Dallas |
43 |
24 |
18 |
1 |
49 |
3 |
21 |
0.570 |
4 |
93.44 |
PAC |
9 |
Minnesota |
45 |
22 |
16 |
7 |
51 |
5 |
17 |
0.567 |
4 |
92.93 |
NW |
10 |
Colorado |
46 |
24 |
20 |
2 |
50 |
7 |
17 |
0.543 |
5 |
89.13 |
NW |
11 |
Phoenix |
45 |
20 |
18 |
7 |
47 |
2 |
18 |
0.522 |
6 |
85.64 |
PAC |
12 |
Calgary |
46 |
21 |
20 |
5 |
47 |
1 |
20 |
0.511 |
6.5 |
83.78 |
NW |
13 |
Edmonton |
43 |
16 |
23 |
4 |
36 |
1 |
15 |
0.419 |
11 |
68.65 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
43 |
14 |
22 |
7 |
35 |
1 |
13 |
0.407 |
11 |
66.74 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
44 |
12 |
27 |
5 |
29 |
3 |
9 |
0.330 |
15 |
54.05 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
214 |
254 |
0.593 |
97.33 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
219 |
245 |
0.559 |
91.74 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
218 |
220 |
0.505 |
82.75 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
217 |
238 |
0.548 |
89.94 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
221 |
256 |
0.579 |
94.99 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
225 |
243 |
0.540 |
88.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
651 |
719 |
0.552 |
90.57 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
663 |
737 |
0.556 |
91.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
21.61% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
31
Dec
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 2 Comments
Current after all games on January 7, 2012.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
39 |
26 |
9 |
4 |
56 |
1 |
25 |
0.718 |
0 |
117.74 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
38 |
26 |
11 |
1 |
53 |
3 |
23 |
0.697 |
1 |
114.37 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
41 |
20 |
13 |
8 |
48 |
2 |
18 |
0.585 |
5 |
96.00 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
39 |
24 |
11 |
4 |
52 |
0 |
24 |
0.667 |
2 |
109.33 |
ATL |
5 |
New Jersey |
41 |
23 |
16 |
2 |
48 |
8 |
15 |
0.585 |
5 |
96.00 |
ATL |
6 |
Pittsburgh |
40 |
21 |
15 |
4 |
46 |
3 |
18 |
0.575 |
5.5 |
94.30 |
ATL |
7 |
Toronto |
41 |
21 |
15 |
5 |
47 |
3 |
18 |
0.573 |
5.5 |
94.00 |
NE |
8 |
Ottawa |
42 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
48 |
4 |
17 |
0.571 |
5.5 |
93.71 |
NE |
9 |
Washington |
39 |
21 |
16 |
2 |
44 |
1 |
20 |
0.564 |
6 |
92.51 |
SE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
41 |
20 |
16 |
5 |
45 |
1 |
19 |
0.549 |
6.5 |
90.00 |
SE |
11 |
Buffalo |
41 |
18 |
18 |
5 |
41 |
2 |
16 |
0.500 |
8.5 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Montreal |
41 |
16 |
18 |
7 |
39 |
1 |
15 |
0.476 |
9.5 |
78.00 |
NE |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
40 |
17 |
20 |
3 |
37 |
2 |
15 |
0.463 |
10 |
75.85 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
39 |
14 |
19 |
6 |
34 |
3 |
11 |
0.436 |
11 |
71.49 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
43 |
14 |
22 |
7 |
35 |
0 |
14 |
0.407 |
13 |
66.74 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
San Jose |
38 |
23 |
11 |
4 |
50 |
5 |
18 |
0.658 |
0 |
107.89 |
PAC |
2* |
Vancouver |
42 |
26 |
13 |
3 |
55 |
1 |
25 |
0.655 |
(0.5) |
107.38 |
NW |
3* |
St. Louis |
41 |
24 |
12 |
5 |
53 |
0 |
24 |
0.646 |
0 |
106.00 |
CTL |
4 |
Detroit |
40 |
25 |
14 |
1 |
51 |
1 |
24 |
0.638 |
0.5 |
104.55 |
CTL |
5 |
Chicago |
41 |
24 |
13 |
4 |
52 |
4 |
20 |
0.634 |
0.5 |
104.00 |
CTL |
6 |
Dallas |
40 |
23 |
16 |
1 |
47 |
2 |
21 |
0.588 |
2.5 |
96.35 |
PAC |
7 |
Nashville |
41 |
22 |
15 |
4 |
48 |
3 |
19 |
0.585 |
2.5 |
96.00 |
CTL |
8 |
Minnesota |
42 |
21 |
15 |
6 |
48 |
4 |
17 |
0.571 |
3 |
93.71 |
NW |
9 |
Los Angeles |
42 |
20 |
15 |
7 |
47 |
3 |
17 |
0.560 |
3.5 |
91.76 |
PAC |
10 |
Colorado |
43 |
23 |
19 |
1 |
47 |
7 |
16 |
0.547 |
4 |
89.63 |
NW |
11 |
Phoenix |
42 |
20 |
17 |
5 |
45 |
2 |
18 |
0.536 |
4.5 |
87.86 |
PAC |
12 |
Calgary |
43 |
19 |
19 |
5 |
43 |
1 |
18 |
0.500 |
6 |
82.00 |
NW |
13 |
Edmonton |
41 |
16 |
22 |
3 |
35 |
1 |
15 |
0.427 |
9 |
70.00 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
39 |
11 |
22 |
6 |
28 |
1 |
10 |
0.359 |
12 |
58.87 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
40 |
11 |
24 |
5 |
27 |
3 |
8 |
0.338 |
13 |
55.35 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
198 |
236 |
0.596 |
97.74 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
203 |
228 |
0.562 |
92.10 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
204 |
209 |
0.512 |
84.01 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
201 |
217 |
0.540 |
88.53 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
203 |
231 |
0.569 |
93.31 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
211 |
228 |
0.540 |
88.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
605 |
673 |
0.556 |
91.22 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
615 |
676 |
0.550 |
90.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg: |
21.15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
23
Dec
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current after all games on December 31, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Boston |
35 |
24 |
10 |
1 |
49 |
3 |
21 |
0.700 |
0 |
114.80 |
NE |
2* |
NY Rangers |
36 |
23 |
9 |
4 |
50 |
1 |
22 |
0.694 |
0 |
113.89 |
ATL |
3* |
Florida |
39 |
20 |
12 |
7 |
47 |
2 |
18 |
0.603 |
3 |
98.82 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
36 |
22 |
10 |
4 |
48 |
0 |
22 |
0.667 |
1 |
109.33 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
38 |
21 |
13 |
4 |
46 |
3 |
18 |
0.605 |
3 |
99.26 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
37 |
21 |
15 |
1 |
43 |
8 |
13 |
0.581 |
4 |
95.30 |
ATL |
7 |
Washington |
37 |
20 |
15 |
2 |
42 |
1 |
19 |
0.568 |
4.5 |
93.08 |
SE |
8 |
Winnipeg |
38 |
19 |
14 |
5 |
43 |
1 |
18 |
0.566 |
4.5 |
92.79 |
SE |
9 |
Ottawa |
39 |
19 |
15 |
5 |
43 |
4 |
15 |
0.551 |
5 |
90.41 |
NE |
10 |
Toronto |
38 |
18 |
15 |
5 |
41 |
3 |
15 |
0.539 |
5.5 |
88.47 |
NE |
11 |
Buffalo |
38 |
17 |
17 |
4 |
38 |
2 |
15 |
0.500 |
7 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Tampa Bay |
37 |
17 |
17 |
3 |
37 |
2 |
15 |
0.500 |
7 |
82.00 |
SE |
13 |
Montreal |
39 |
14 |
18 |
7 |
35 |
1 |
13 |
0.449 |
9 |
73.59 |
NE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
36 |
13 |
17 |
6 |
32 |
2 |
11 |
0.444 |
9 |
72.89 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
40 |
13 |
21 |
6 |
32 |
0 |
13 |
0.400 |
11 |
65.60 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Chicago |
38 |
24 |
10 |
4 |
52 |
4 |
20 |
0.684 |
0 |
112.21 |
CTL |
2* |
Vancouver |
39 |
24 |
13 |
2 |
50 |
1 |
23 |
0.641 |
1.5 |
105.13 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
34 |
19 |
11 |
4 |
42 |
4 |
15 |
0.618 |
3 |
101.29 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
38 |
24 |
13 |
1 |
49 |
1 |
23 |
0.645 |
1.5 |
105.74 |
CTL |
5 |
St. Louis |
38 |
21 |
12 |
5 |
47 |
0 |
21 |
0.618 |
2.5 |
101.42 |
CTL |
6 |
Minnesota |
40 |
21 |
13 |
6 |
48 |
4 |
17 |
0.600 |
3 |
98.40 |
NW |
7 |
Dallas |
37 |
21 |
15 |
1 |
43 |
2 |
19 |
0.581 |
4 |
95.30 |
PAC |
8 |
Nashville |
38 |
20 |
14 |
4 |
44 |
3 |
17 |
0.579 |
4 |
94.95 |
CTL |
9 |
Los Angeles |
39 |
19 |
14 |
6 |
44 |
3 |
16 |
0.564 |
4.5 |
92.51 |
PAC |
10 |
Phoenix |
39 |
19 |
16 |
4 |
42 |
2 |
17 |
0.538 |
5.5 |
88.31 |
PAC |
11 |
Colorado |
40 |
21 |
18 |
1 |
43 |
6 |
15 |
0.538 |
5.5 |
88.15 |
NW |
12 |
Calgary |
39 |
18 |
16 |
5 |
41 |
1 |
17 |
0.526 |
6 |
86.21 |
NW |
13 |
Edmonton |
37 |
15 |
19 |
3 |
33 |
1 |
14 |
0.446 |
9 |
73.14 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
37 |
10 |
21 |
6 |
26 |
1 |
9 |
0.351 |
13 |
57.62 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
38 |
10 |
23 |
5 |
25 |
3 |
7 |
0.329 |
14 |
53.95 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
Atlantic |
183 |
219 |
0.598 |
98.13 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
189 |
206 |
0.545 |
89.38 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
191 |
201 |
0.526 |
86.29 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
186 |
197 |
0.530 |
86.85 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
190 |
217 |
0.571 |
93.65 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
195 |
215 |
0.551 |
90.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
563 |
626 |
0.556 |
91.18 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
571 |
629 |
0.551 |
90.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.34% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
18
Dec
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current as of December 24, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Boston |
33 |
23 |
9 |
1 |
47 |
3 |
20 |
0.712 |
0 |
116.79 |
NE |
2* |
NY Rangers |
33 |
21 |
8 |
4 |
46 |
1 |
20 |
0.697 |
0.5 |
114.30 |
ATL |
3* |
Florida |
36 |
18 |
11 |
7 |
43 |
2 |
16 |
0.597 |
3.5 |
97.94 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
34 |
21 |
9 |
4 |
46 |
0 |
21 |
0.676 |
1 |
110.94 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
35 |
20 |
11 |
4 |
44 |
3 |
17 |
0.629 |
2.5 |
103.09 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
34 |
19 |
14 |
1 |
39 |
8 |
11 |
0.574 |
4.5 |
94.06 |
ATL |
7 |
Toronto |
35 |
18 |
13 |
4 |
40 |
3 |
15 |
0.571 |
4.5 |
93.71 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
33 |
17 |
14 |
2 |
36 |
1 |
16 |
0.545 |
5.5 |
89.45 |
SE |
9 |
Ottawa |
36 |
17 |
14 |
5 |
39 |
3 |
14 |
0.542 |
5.5 |
88.83 |
NE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
35 |
16 |
14 |
5 |
37 |
1 |
15 |
0.529 |
6 |
86.69 |
SE |
11 |
Buffalo |
34 |
16 |
15 |
3 |
35 |
2 |
14 |
0.515 |
6.5 |
84.41 |
NE |
12 |
Montreal |
36 |
13 |
16 |
7 |
33 |
1 |
12 |
0.458 |
8.5 |
75.17 |
NE |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
34 |
14 |
17 |
3 |
31 |
2 |
12 |
0.456 |
8.5 |
74.76 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
33 |
11 |
16 |
6 |
28 |
2 |
9 |
0.424 |
9.5 |
69.58 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
36 |
11 |
19 |
6 |
28 |
0 |
11 |
0.389 |
11 |
63.78 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Chicago |
35 |
22 |
9 |
4 |
48 |
4 |
18 |
0.686 |
0 |
112.46 |
CTL |
2* |
San Jose |
32 |
19 |
10 |
3 |
41 |
4 |
15 |
0.641 |
2 |
105.06 |
PAC |
3* |
Vancouver |
35 |
21 |
12 |
2 |
44 |
1 |
20 |
0.629 |
2 |
103.09 |
NW |
4 |
St. Louis |
34 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
44 |
0 |
20 |
0.647 |
1.5 |
106.12 |
CTL |
5 |
Detroit |
34 |
21 |
12 |
1 |
43 |
1 |
20 |
0.632 |
2 |
103.71 |
CTL |
6 |
Minnesota |
36 |
20 |
11 |
5 |
45 |
4 |
16 |
0.625 |
2 |
102.50 |
NW |
7 |
Dallas |
34 |
20 |
13 |
1 |
41 |
2 |
18 |
0.603 |
3 |
98.88 |
PAC |
8 |
Nashville |
35 |
18 |
13 |
4 |
40 |
1 |
17 |
0.571 |
4 |
93.71 |
CTL |
9 |
Phoenix |
35 |
18 |
14 |
3 |
39 |
2 |
16 |
0.557 |
4.5 |
91.37 |
PAC |
10 |
Los Angeles |
35 |
16 |
14 |
5 |
37 |
3 |
13 |
0.529 |
5.5 |
86.69 |
PAC |
11 |
Calgary |
36 |
17 |
15 |
4 |
38 |
0 |
17 |
0.528 |
5.5 |
86.56 |
NW |
12 |
Colorado |
36 |
18 |
17 |
1 |
37 |
6 |
12 |
0.514 |
6 |
84.28 |
NW |
13 |
Edmonton |
34 |
15 |
16 |
3 |
33 |
1 |
14 |
0.485 |
7 |
79.59 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
34 |
9 |
19 |
6 |
24 |
1 |
8 |
0.353 |
11.5 |
57.88 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
34 |
9 |
21 |
4 |
22 |
3 |
6 |
0.324 |
12.5 |
53.06 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
169 |
203 |
0.601 |
98.50 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
174 |
194 |
0.557 |
91.43 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
174 |
175 |
0.503 |
82.47 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
170 |
182 |
0.535 |
87.79 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
172 |
197 |
0.573 |
93.92 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
177 |
197 |
0.556 |
91.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
517 |
572 |
0.553 |
90.72 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
519 |
576 |
0.555 |
91.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.62% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
10
Dec
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 3 Comments
Updated after all games on December 17, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Philadelphia |
31 |
20 |
8 |
3 |
43 |
0 |
20 |
0.694 |
0 |
113.74 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
31 |
21 |
9 |
1 |
43 |
3 |
18 |
0.694 |
0 |
113.74 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
32 |
17 |
9 |
6 |
40 |
2 |
15 |
0.625 |
2 |
102.50 |
SE |
4 |
NY Rangers |
30 |
18 |
8 |
4 |
40 |
1 |
17 |
0.667 |
1 |
109.33 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
33 |
18 |
11 |
4 |
40 |
3 |
15 |
0.606 |
2.5 |
99.39 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
32 |
18 |
13 |
1 |
37 |
7 |
11 |
0.578 |
3.5 |
94.81 |
ATL |
7 |
Buffalo |
32 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
35 |
2 |
14 |
0.547 |
4.5 |
89.69 |
NE |
8 |
Toronto |
32 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
35 |
3 |
13 |
0.547 |
4.5 |
89.69 |
NE |
9 |
Washington |
31 |
16 |
14 |
1 |
33 |
1 |
15 |
0.532 |
5 |
87.29 |
SE |
10 |
Winnipeg |
32 |
15 |
13 |
4 |
34 |
1 |
14 |
0.531 |
5 |
87.13 |
SE |
11 |
Ottawa |
33 |
15 |
14 |
4 |
34 |
3 |
12 |
0.515 |
5.5 |
84.48 |
NE |
12 |
Montreal |
33 |
13 |
13 |
7 |
33 |
1 |
12 |
0.500 |
6 |
82.00 |
NE |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
32 |
14 |
16 |
2 |
30 |
2 |
12 |
0.469 |
7 |
76.88 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
30 |
10 |
14 |
6 |
26 |
1 |
9 |
0.433 |
8 |
71.07 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
33 |
10 |
18 |
5 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
0.379 |
10 |
62.12 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Chicago |
32 |
20 |
8 |
4 |
44 |
4 |
16 |
0.688 |
0 |
112.75 |
CTL |
2* |
Minnesota |
33 |
20 |
8 |
5 |
45 |
4 |
16 |
0.682 |
0 |
111.82 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
30 |
17 |
10 |
3 |
37 |
3 |
14 |
0.617 |
2.5 |
101.13 |
PAC |
4 |
Detroit |
31 |
20 |
10 |
1 |
41 |
1 |
19 |
0.661 |
1 |
108.45 |
CTL |
5 |
St. Louis |
31 |
18 |
9 |
4 |
40 |
0 |
18 |
0.645 |
1.5 |
105.81 |
CTL |
6 |
Vancouver |
32 |
19 |
11 |
2 |
40 |
1 |
18 |
0.625 |
2 |
102.50 |
NW |
7 |
Dallas |
31 |
18 |
12 |
1 |
37 |
2 |
16 |
0.597 |
3 |
97.87 |
PAC |
8 |
Nashville |
32 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
38 |
1 |
16 |
0.594 |
3 |
97.38 |
CTL |
9 |
Phoenix |
32 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
35 |
2 |
14 |
0.547 |
4.5 |
89.69 |
PAC |
10 |
Calgary |
32 |
14 |
14 |
4 |
32 |
0 |
14 |
0.500 |
6 |
82.00 |
NW |
11 |
Los Angeles |
32 |
14 |
14 |
4 |
32 |
1 |
13 |
0.500 |
6 |
82.00 |
PAC |
12 |
Edmonton |
32 |
14 |
15 |
3 |
31 |
1 |
13 |
0.484 |
6.5 |
79.44 |
NW |
13 |
Colorado |
33 |
15 |
17 |
1 |
31 |
5 |
10 |
0.470 |
7 |
77.03 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
32 |
9 |
18 |
5 |
23 |
1 |
8 |
0.359 |
10.5 |
58.94 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
32 |
9 |
19 |
4 |
22 |
3 |
6 |
0.344 |
11 |
56.38 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
156 |
186 |
0.596 |
97.77 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
161 |
180 |
0.559 |
91.68 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
160 |
162 |
0.506 |
83.03 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
157 |
164 |
0.522 |
85.66 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
158 |
185 |
0.585 |
96.01 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
162 |
179 |
0.552 |
90.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
477 |
528 |
0.553 |
90.77 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
477 |
528 |
0.553 |
90.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
3
Dec
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, NHL projected standings, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Updated at the end of action on December 10, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Philadelphia |
28 |
18 |
7 |
3 |
39 |
0 |
18 |
0.696 |
0 |
114.21 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
28 |
18 |
9 |
1 |
37 |
3 |
15 |
0.661 |
1 |
108.36 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
29 |
16 |
8 |
5 |
37 |
1 |
15 |
0.638 |
1.5 |
104.62 |
SE |
4 |
NY Rangers |
26 |
16 |
6 |
4 |
36 |
1 |
15 |
0.692 |
0.5 |
113.54 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
30 |
17 |
9 |
4 |
38 |
3 |
14 |
0.633 |
1.5 |
103.87 |
ATL |
6 |
Toronto |
29 |
15 |
11 |
3 |
33 |
3 |
12 |
0.569 |
3.5 |
93.31 |
NE |
7 |
Washington |
28 |
15 |
12 |
1 |
31 |
1 |
14 |
0.554 |
4 |
90.79 |
SE |
8 |
Buffalo |
29 |
15 |
12 |
2 |
32 |
2 |
13 |
0.552 |
4 |
90.48 |
NE |
9 |
New Jersey |
28 |
14 |
13 |
1 |
29 |
6 |
8 |
0.518 |
5 |
84.93 |
ATL |
10 |
Winnipeg |
29 |
13 |
12 |
4 |
30 |
1 |
12 |
0.517 |
5 |
84.83 |
SE |
11 |
Montreal |
30 |
12 |
11 |
7 |
31 |
1 |
11 |
0.517 |
5 |
84.73 |
NE |
12 |
Ottawa |
30 |
13 |
13 |
4 |
30 |
3 |
10 |
0.500 |
5.5 |
82.00 |
NE |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
29 |
12 |
15 |
2 |
26 |
2 |
10 |
0.448 |
7 |
73.52 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
27 |
9 |
12 |
6 |
24 |
0 |
9 |
0.444 |
7 |
72.89 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
31 |
9 |
18 |
4 |
22 |
0 |
9 |
0.355 |
10 |
58.19 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Minnesota |
30 |
20 |
7 |
3 |
43 |
4 |
16 |
0.717 |
0 |
117.53 |
NW |
2* |
Detroit |
28 |
18 |
9 |
1 |
37 |
1 |
17 |
0.661 |
2 |
108.36 |
CTL |
3* |
San Jose |
26 |
15 |
10 |
1 |
31 |
3 |
12 |
0.596 |
4 |
97.77 |
PAC |
4 |
Chicago |
29 |
17 |
8 |
4 |
38 |
3 |
14 |
0.655 |
2 |
107.45 |
CTL |
5 |
Vancouver |
29 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
37 |
1 |
17 |
0.638 |
2.5 |
104.62 |
NW |
6 |
St. Louis |
29 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
37 |
0 |
17 |
0.638 |
2.5 |
104.62 |
CTL |
7 |
Dallas |
28 |
16 |
11 |
1 |
33 |
2 |
14 |
0.589 |
4 |
96.64 |
PAC |
8 |
Phoenix |
29 |
15 |
11 |
3 |
33 |
2 |
13 |
0.569 |
4.5 |
93.31 |
PAC |
9 |
Nashville |
29 |
14 |
11 |
4 |
32 |
0 |
14 |
0.552 |
5 |
90.48 |
CTL |
10 |
Calgary |
29 |
14 |
13 |
2 |
30 |
0 |
14 |
0.517 |
6 |
84.83 |
NW |
11 |
Los Angeles |
29 |
13 |
12 |
4 |
30 |
1 |
12 |
0.517 |
6 |
84.83 |
PAC |
12 |
Edmonton |
30 |
14 |
13 |
3 |
31 |
1 |
13 |
0.517 |
6 |
84.73 |
NW |
13 |
Colorado |
30 |
13 |
16 |
1 |
27 |
4 |
9 |
0.450 |
8 |
73.80 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
29 |
8 |
16 |
5 |
21 |
1 |
7 |
0.362 |
10.5 |
59.38 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
29 |
8 |
17 |
4 |
20 |
2 |
6 |
0.345 |
11 |
56.55 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
139 |
166 |
0.597 |
97.93 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
146 |
163 |
0.558 |
91.55 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
146 |
146 |
0.500 |
82.00 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
141 |
148 |
0.525 |
86.07 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
144 |
164 |
0.569 |
93.39 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
148 |
168 |
0.568 |
93.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
431 |
475 |
0.551 |
90.37 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
433 |
480 |
0.554 |
90.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.06% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
26
Nov
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. 4 Comments
Current after all games on December 3, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
23 |
15 |
5 |
3 |
33 |
1 |
14 |
0.717 |
0 |
117.65 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
24 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
33 |
3 |
13 |
0.688 |
0.5 |
112.75 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
26 |
14 |
8 |
4 |
32 |
1 |
13 |
0.615 |
2 |
100.92 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
27 |
16 |
7 |
4 |
36 |
3 |
13 |
0.667 |
0.5 |
109.33 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
25 |
15 |
7 |
3 |
33 |
0 |
15 |
0.660 |
1 |
108.24 |
ATL |
6 |
Toronto |
26 |
14 |
10 |
2 |
30 |
3 |
11 |
0.577 |
3 |
94.62 |
NE |
7 |
Buffalo |
26 |
14 |
11 |
1 |
29 |
2 |
12 |
0.558 |
3.5 |
91.46 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
25 |
13 |
11 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
12 |
0.540 |
4 |
88.56 |
SE |
9 |
Ottawa |
26 |
12 |
11 |
3 |
27 |
3 |
9 |
0.519 |
4.5 |
85.15 |
NE |
10 |
Montreal |
27 |
11 |
11 |
5 |
27 |
1 |
10 |
0.500 |
5 |
82.00 |
NE |
11 |
Winnipeg |
26 |
11 |
11 |
4 |
26 |
1 |
10 |
0.500 |
5 |
82.00 |
SE |
12 |
New Jersey |
25 |
12 |
12 |
1 |
25 |
5 |
7 |
0.500 |
5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
13 |
Tampa Bay |
25 |
11 |
12 |
2 |
24 |
1 |
10 |
0.480 |
5.5 |
78.72 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
24 |
8 |
11 |
5 |
21 |
0 |
8 |
0.438 |
6.5 |
71.75 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
28 |
8 |
16 |
4 |
20 |
0 |
8 |
0.357 |
9 |
58.57 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
24 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
33 |
1 |
15 |
0.688 |
0 |
112.75 |
CTL |
2* |
Minnesota |
26 |
16 |
7 |
3 |
35 |
4 |
12 |
0.673 |
0 |
110.38 |
NW |
3* |
San Jose |
23 |
14 |
8 |
1 |
29 |
3 |
11 |
0.630 |
1.5 |
103.39 |
PAC |
4 |
Chicago |
27 |
16 |
8 |
3 |
35 |
3 |
13 |
0.648 |
0.5 |
106.30 |
CTL |
5 |
St. Louis |
26 |
14 |
9 |
3 |
31 |
0 |
14 |
0.596 |
2 |
97.77 |
CTL |
6 |
Dallas |
26 |
15 |
10 |
1 |
31 |
2 |
13 |
0.596 |
2 |
97.77 |
PAC |
7 |
Vancouver |
25 |
14 |
10 |
1 |
29 |
0 |
14 |
0.580 |
2.5 |
95.12 |
NW |
8 |
Phoenix |
25 |
13 |
9 |
3 |
29 |
1 |
12 |
0.580 |
2.5 |
95.12 |
PAC |
9 |
Los Angeles |
26 |
13 |
9 |
4 |
30 |
1 |
12 |
0.577 |
2.5 |
94.62 |
PAC |
10 |
Nashville |
26 |
12 |
10 |
4 |
28 |
0 |
12 |
0.538 |
3.5 |
88.31 |
CTL |
11 |
Edmonton |
27 |
13 |
11 |
3 |
29 |
1 |
12 |
0.537 |
3.5 |
88.07 |
NW |
12 |
Colorado |
26 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
25 |
4 |
8 |
0.481 |
5 |
78.85 |
NW |
13 |
Calgary |
25 |
11 |
12 |
2 |
24 |
0 |
11 |
0.480 |
5 |
78.72 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
25 |
7 |
13 |
5 |
19 |
1 |
6 |
0.380 |
7.5 |
62.32 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
26 |
7 |
16 |
3 |
17 |
1 |
6 |
0.327 |
9 |
53.62 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
124 |
148 |
0.597 |
97.87 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
129 |
146 |
0.566 |
92.81 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
130 |
129 |
0.496 |
81.37 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
125 |
138 |
0.552 |
90.53 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
129 |
144 |
0.558 |
91.53 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
129 |
142 |
0.550 |
90.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
383 |
423 |
0.552 |
90.56 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
383 |
424 |
0.554 |
90.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
19
Nov
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, games in hand, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current after all games on November 26, 2011.
[Explanation here or below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
20 |
12 |
5 |
3 |
27 |
1 |
11 |
0.675 |
0 |
110.70 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
22 |
14 |
7 |
1 |
29 |
3 |
11 |
0.659 |
0 |
108.09 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
23 |
12 |
7 |
4 |
28 |
1 |
11 |
0.609 |
1 |
99.83 |
SE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
24 |
14 |
6 |
4 |
32 |
3 |
11 |
0.667 |
(0.5) |
109.33 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
23 |
13 |
7 |
3 |
29 |
0 |
13 |
0.630 |
0.5 |
103.39 |
ATL |
6 |
Toronto |
23 |
13 |
8 |
2 |
28 |
3 |
10 |
0.609 |
1 |
99.83 |
NE |
7 |
Buffalo |
23 |
13 |
9 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
11 |
0.587 |
1.5 |
96.26 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
22 |
12 |
9 |
1 |
25 |
1 |
11 |
0.568 |
2 |
93.18 |
SE |
9 |
New Jersey |
22 |
12 |
9 |
1 |
25 |
5 |
7 |
0.568 |
2 |
93.18 |
ATL |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
22 |
11 |
9 |
2 |
24 |
1 |
10 |
0.545 |
2.5 |
89.45 |
SE |
11 |
Montreal |
24 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
24 |
1 |
9 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Ottawa |
22 |
10 |
10 |
2 |
22 |
3 |
7 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
NE |
13 |
Winnipeg |
23 |
9 |
10 |
4 |
22 |
1 |
8 |
0.478 |
4 |
78.43 |
SE |
14 |
Carolina |
24 |
8 |
12 |
4 |
20 |
0 |
8 |
0.417 |
5.5 |
68.33 |
SE |
15 |
NY Islanders |
21 |
6 |
11 |
4 |
16 |
0 |
6 |
0.381 |
6 |
62.48 |
ATL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
San Jose |
20 |
13 |
6 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
11 |
0.675 |
0 |
110.70 |
PAC |
2* |
Detroit |
22 |
14 |
7 |
1 |
29 |
1 |
13 |
0.659 |
0 |
108.09 |
CTL |
3* |
Minnesota |
22 |
13 |
6 |
3 |
29 |
3 |
10 |
0.659 |
0 |
108.09 |
NW |
4 |
Chicago |
24 |
14 |
7 |
3 |
31 |
2 |
12 |
0.646 |
0 |
105.92 |
CTL |
5 |
Phoenix |
22 |
12 |
7 |
3 |
27 |
1 |
11 |
0.614 |
1 |
100.64 |
PAC |
6 |
St. Louis |
22 |
12 |
8 |
2 |
26 |
0 |
12 |
0.591 |
1.5 |
96.91 |
CTL |
7 |
Vancouver |
23 |
13 |
9 |
1 |
27 |
0 |
13 |
0.587 |
1.5 |
96.26 |
NW |
8 |
Dallas |
23 |
13 |
9 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
11 |
0.587 |
1.5 |
96.26 |
PAC |
9 |
Edmonton |
23 |
12 |
9 |
2 |
26 |
1 |
11 |
0.565 |
2 |
92.70 |
NW |
10 |
Los Angeles |
23 |
11 |
8 |
4 |
26 |
1 |
10 |
0.565 |
2 |
92.70 |
PAC |
11 |
Nashville |
22 |
10 |
8 |
4 |
24 |
0 |
10 |
0.545 |
2.5 |
89.45 |
CTL |
12 |
Colorado |
23 |
10 |
12 |
1 |
21 |
3 |
7 |
0.457 |
4.5 |
74.87 |
NW |
13 |
Calgary |
21 |
8 |
12 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
8 |
0.405 |
5.5 |
66.38 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
22 |
6 |
12 |
4 |
16 |
1 |
5 |
0.364 |
6.5 |
59.64 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
22 |
6 |
13 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
0.341 |
7 |
55.91 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
110 |
129 |
0.586 |
96.16 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
114 |
130 |
0.570 |
93.51 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
114 |
119 |
0.522 |
85.60 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
110 |
123 |
0.559 |
91.69 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
112 |
125 |
0.558 |
91.52 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
112 |
120 |
0.536 |
87.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
338 |
378 |
0.559 |
91.70 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
334 |
368 |
0.551 |
90.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
22.02% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
12
Nov
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Current after all games on November 19, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
NY Rangers |
17 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
9 |
0.676 |
0 |
110.94 |
ATL |
2* |
Boston |
18 |
11 |
7 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
9 |
0.611 |
1 |
100.22 |
NE |
3* |
Florida |
19 |
10 |
6 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
9 |
0.605 |
1 |
99.26 |
SE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
19 |
11 |
5 |
3 |
25 |
0 |
11 |
0.658 |
0 |
107.89 |
ATL |
5 |
Pittsburgh |
20 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
25 |
3 |
8 |
0.625 |
0.5 |
102.50 |
ATL |
6 |
Buffalo |
20 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
24 |
2 |
10 |
0.600 |
1 |
98.40 |
NE |
7 |
Toronto |
20 |
11 |
7 |
2 |
24 |
2 |
9 |
0.600 |
1 |
98.40 |
NE |
8 |
Washington |
18 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
21 |
1 |
9 |
0.583 |
1.5 |
95.67 |
SE |
9 |
New Jersey |
18 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
21 |
4 |
6 |
0.583 |
1.5 |
95.67 |
ATL |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
19 |
9 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
1 |
8 |
0.526 |
2.5 |
86.32 |
SE |
11 |
Montreal |
20 |
9 |
8 |
3 |
21 |
0 |
9 |
0.525 |
2.5 |
86.10 |
NE |
12 |
Ottawa |
20 |
10 |
9 |
1 |
21 |
3 |
7 |
0.525 |
2.5 |
86.10 |
NE |
13 |
Winnipeg |
20 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
19 |
1 |
7 |
0.475 |
3.5 |
77.90 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
17 |
5 |
9 |
3 |
13 |
0 |
5 |
0.382 |
5 |
62.71 |
ATL |
15 |
Carolina |
20 |
6 |
11 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
0.375 |
5.5 |
61.50 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
San Jose |
17 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
23 |
2 |
9 |
0.676 |
0 |
110.94 |
PAC |
2* |
Minnesota |
20 |
12 |
5 |
3 |
27 |
3 |
9 |
0.675 |
(0.5) |
110.70 |
NW |
3* |
Chicago |
21 |
12 |
6 |
3 |
27 |
2 |
10 |
0.643 |
0 |
105.43 |
CTL |
4 |
Phoenix |
18 |
10 |
5 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
9 |
0.639 |
0.5 |
104.78 |
PAC |
5 |
Nashville |
19 |
10 |
5 |
4 |
24 |
0 |
10 |
0.632 |
0.5 |
103.58 |
CTL |
6 |
Detroit |
18 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
10 |
0.583 |
1.5 |
95.67 |
CTL |
7 |
St. Louis |
19 |
10 |
7 |
2 |
22 |
0 |
10 |
0.579 |
1.5 |
94.95 |
CTL |
8 |
Dallas |
19 |
11 |
8 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
9 |
0.579 |
1.5 |
94.95 |
PAC |
9 |
Edmonton |
19 |
10 |
7 |
2 |
22 |
1 |
9 |
0.579 |
1.5 |
94.95 |
NW |
10 |
Los Angeles |
20 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
23 |
1 |
9 |
0.575 |
1.5 |
94.30 |
PAC |
11 |
Vancouver |
19 |
9 |
9 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
9 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
NW |
12 |
Colorado |
20 |
9 |
10 |
1 |
19 |
3 |
6 |
0.475 |
3.5 |
77.90 |
NW |
13 |
Calgary |
18 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
8 |
0.472 |
3.5 |
77.44 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
19 |
6 |
9 |
4 |
16 |
1 |
5 |
0.421 |
4.5 |
69.05 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
19 |
4 |
13 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
0.263 |
7.5 |
43.16 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
91 |
107 |
0.588 |
96.42 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
98 |
112 |
0.571 |
93.71 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
96 |
98 |
0.510 |
83.71 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
93 |
107 |
0.575 |
94.34 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
96 |
104 |
0.542 |
88.83 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
96 |
104 |
0.542 |
88.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
285 |
317 |
0.556 |
91.21 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
285 |
315 |
0.553 |
90.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
21.75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
6
Nov
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL .500, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL division comparison, nhl regulation and overtime wins, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, ROW, three point games. Leave a Comment
Updated after the end of all games on November 12, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Washington |
15 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
21 |
1 |
9 |
0.700 |
0 |
114.80 |
SE |
2* |
NY Rangers |
15 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
21 |
1 |
8 |
0.700 |
0 |
114.80 |
ATL |
3* |
Buffalo |
16 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
9 |
0.625 |
1 |
102.50 |
NE |
4 |
Pittsburgh |
17 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
23 |
3 |
7 |
0.676 |
0 |
110.94 |
ATL |
5 |
Philadelphia |
15 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
8 |
0.633 |
1 |
103.87 |
ATL |
6 |
Florida |
15 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
19 |
1 |
7 |
0.633 |
1 |
103.87 |
SE |
7 |
Toronto |
17 |
10 |
6 |
1 |
21 |
2 |
8 |
0.618 |
1 |
101.29 |
NE |
8 |
New Jersey |
15 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
17 |
4 |
4 |
0.567 |
2 |
92.93 |
ATL |
9 |
Tampa Bay |
16 |
8 |
6 |
2 |
18 |
1 |
7 |
0.563 |
2 |
92.25 |
SE |
10 |
Boston |
15 |
8 |
7 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
7 |
0.533 |
2.5 |
87.47 |
NE |
11 |
Montreal |
16 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
7 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Ottawa |
18 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
17 |
3 |
5 |
0.472 |
3.5 |
77.44 |
NE |
13 |
Carolina |
17 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
0.441 |
4 |
72.35 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
13 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
0.423 |
4 |
69.38 |
ATL |
15 |
Winnipeg |
17 |
5 |
9 |
3 |
13 |
1 |
4 |
0.382 |
5 |
62.71 |
SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Dallas |
16 |
11 |
5 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
9 |
0.688 |
0 |
112.75 |
PAC |
2* |
Chicago |
17 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
23 |
2 |
8 |
0.676 |
0 |
110.94 |
CTL |
3* |
Edmonton |
16 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
1 |
8 |
0.625 |
1 |
102.50 |
NW |
4 |
Detroit |
15 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
9 |
0.633 |
1 |
103.87 |
CTL |
5 |
Phoenix |
15 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
8 |
0.633 |
1 |
103.87 |
PAC |
6 |
San Jose |
15 |
9 |
5 |
1 |
19 |
2 |
7 |
0.633 |
1 |
103.87 |
PAC |
7 |
Nashville |
16 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
8 |
0.594 |
1.5 |
97.38 |
CTL |
8 |
Minnesota |
16 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
6 |
0.594 |
1.5 |
97.38 |
NW |
9 |
Los Angeles |
17 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
8 |
0.559 |
2 |
91.65 |
PAC |
10 |
St. Louis |
16 |
8 |
7 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
8 |
0.531 |
2.5 |
87.13 |
CTL |
11 |
Vancouver |
17 |
8 |
8 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
8 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
NW |
12 |
Colorado |
17 |
8 |
8 |
1 |
17 |
3 |
5 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
NW |
13 |
Calgary |
16 |
7 |
8 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
7 |
0.469 |
3.5 |
76.88 |
NW |
14 |
Anaheim |
16 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
5 |
0.469 |
3.5 |
76.88 |
PAC |
15 |
Columbus |
16 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
0.219 |
7.5 |
35.88 |
CTL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIV/CONF |
GP |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. Pace |
|
|
|
|
Atlantic |
75 |
91 |
0.607 |
99.49 |
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
82 |
90 |
0.549 |
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
Southeast |
80 |
86 |
0.538 |
88.15 |
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
79 |
94 |
0.595 |
97.57 |
|
|
|
|
Central |
80 |
85 |
0.531 |
87.13 |
|
|
|
|
Northwest |
82 |
88 |
0.537 |
88.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECF Avg. |
237 |
267 |
0.563 |
92.38 |
|
|
|
|
WCF Avg. |
241 |
267 |
0.554 |
90.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-pt Game Pctg.: |
|
23.43% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True .500: |
0.559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ Continue reading
29
Oct
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, three point games. 5 Comments
Updated after all games on November 5, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Washington |
12 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
8 |
0.750 |
0 |
123.00 |
SE |
2* |
Pittsburgh |
15 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
21 |
3 |
6 |
0.700 |
0 |
114.80 |
ATL |
3* |
Toronto |
14 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
19 |
1 |
8 |
0.679 |
0.5 |
111.29 |
NE |
4 |
Philadelphia |
14 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
18 |
0 |
8 |
0.643 |
1 |
105.43 |
ATL |
5 |
NY Rangers |
12 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
5 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
ATL |
6 |
Buffalo |
13 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
7 |
0.615 |
1.5 |
100.92 |
NE |
7 |
Florida |
12 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
5 |
0.583 |
2 |
95.67 |
SE |
8 |
New Jersey |
12 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
13 |
3 |
3 |
0.542 |
2.5 |
88.83 |
ATL |
9 |
Tampa Bay |
13 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
6 |
0.538 |
2.5 |
88.31 |
SE |
10 |
Carolina |
13 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
13 |
0 |
5 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
SE |
11 |
Ottawa |
15 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
15 |
3 |
4 |
0.500 |
3 |
82.00 |
NE |
12 |
Montreal |
13 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
5 |
0.462 |
3.5 |
75.69 |
NE |
13 |
Winnipeg |
13 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
4 |
0.462 |
3.5 |
75.69 |
SE |
14 |
NY Islanders |
11 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
0.455 |
3.5 |
74.55 |
ATL |
15 |
Boston |
12 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
4 |
0.417 |
4 |
68.33 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Dallas |
12 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
18 |
2 |
7 |
0.750 |
0 |
123.00 |
PAC |
2* |
Chicago |
13 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
6 |
0.731 |
0 |
119.85 |
CTL |
3* |
Edmonton |
13 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
18 |
1 |
7 |
0.692 |
0.5 |
113.54 |
NW |
4 |
Minnesota |
13 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
5 |
0.654 |
1 |
107.23 |
NW |
5 |
San Jose |
12 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
5 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
PAC |
6 |
Phoenix |
13 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
7 |
0.615 |
1.5 |
100.92 |
PAC |
7 |
Nashville |
13 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
7 |
0.615 |
1.5 |
100.92 |
CTL |
8 |
Los Angeles |
13 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
0.577 |
2 |
94.62 |
PAC |
9 |
Colorado |
13 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
15 |
3 |
4 |
0.577 |
2 |
94.62 |
NW |
10 |
Detroit |
12 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
6 |
0.542 |
2.5 |
88.83 |
CTL |
11 |
Vancouver |
14 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
6 |
0.464 |
3.5 |
76.14 |
NW |
12 |
Anaheim |
14 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
13 |
1 |
4 |
0.464 |
3.5 |
76.14 |
PAC |
13 |
St. Louis |
13 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
6 |
0.462 |
3.5 |
75.69 |
CTL |
14 |
Calgary |
12 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
0.458 |
3.5 |
75.17 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
14 |
2 |
11 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.179 |
7.5 |
29.29 |
CTL |
_ Continue reading
23
Oct
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, three point games. Leave a Comment
Updated after all games on October 29, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Washington |
9 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
6 |
0.778 |
0 |
127.56 |
SE |
2* |
Toronto |
10 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
6 |
0.750 |
0 |
123.00 |
NE |
3* |
Pittsburgh |
13 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
18 |
2 |
6 |
0.692 |
0 |
113.54 |
ATL |
4 |
Buffalo |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
6 |
0.600 |
1.5 |
98.40 |
NE |
5 |
Florida |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
0.600 |
1.5 |
98.40 |
SE |
6 |
Philadelphia |
11 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
6 |
0.591 |
1.5 |
96.91 |
ATL |
7 |
Tampa Bay |
11 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
5 |
0.545 |
2 |
89.45 |
SE |
8 |
Ottawa |
11 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
0.545 |
2 |
89.45 |
NE |
9 |
Carolina |
11 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
10 |
NY Rangers |
9 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
11 |
New Jersey |
9 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
12 |
Montreal |
11 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
0.455 |
3 |
74.55 |
NE |
13 |
NY Islanders |
9 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
0.444 |
3 |
72.89 |
ATL |
14 |
Winnipeg |
10 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
0.350 |
4 |
57.40 |
SE |
15 |
Boston |
10 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0.300 |
4.5 |
49.20 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Dallas |
11 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
6 |
0.727 |
0 |
119.27 |
PAC |
2* |
Edmonton |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
5 |
0.700 |
0.5 |
114.80 |
NW |
3* |
Chicago |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
5 |
0.700 |
0.5 |
114.80 |
CTL |
4 |
Los Angeles |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
6 |
0.700 |
0.5 |
114.80 |
PAC |
5 |
San Jose |
9 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
0.667 |
1 |
109.33 |
PAC |
6 |
Phoenix |
10 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
5 |
0.600 |
1.5 |
98.40 |
PAC |
7 |
Colorado |
10 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
0.600 |
1.5 |
98.40 |
NW |
8 |
Detroit |
9 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0.556 |
2 |
91.11 |
CTL |
9 |
Nashville |
10 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
0.550 |
2 |
90.20 |
CTL |
10 |
Anaheim |
10 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
4 |
0.550 |
2 |
90.20 |
PAC |
11 |
Minnesota |
10 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
0.550 |
2 |
90.20 |
NW |
12 |
Vancouver |
11 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
NW |
13 |
St. Louis |
10 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
CTL |
14 |
Calgary |
9 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
0.500 |
2.5 |
82.00 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
11 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.136 |
6.5 |
22.36 |
CTL |
_ Continue reading
16
Oct
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, three point games. 2 Comments
Updated after all games on October 22, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Washington |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
6 |
1.000 |
0 |
164.00 |
SE |
2* |
Toronto |
7 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
4 |
0.786 |
1.5 |
128.86 |
NE |
3* |
Pittsburgh |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
5 |
0.700 |
1.5 |
114.80 |
ATL |
4 |
Buffalo |
7 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0.714 |
2 |
117.14 |
NE |
5 |
Philadelphia |
7 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
0.643 |
2.5 |
105.43 |
ATL |
6 |
New Jersey |
6 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0.583 |
3 |
95.67 |
ATL |
7 |
Florida |
7 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
0.571 |
3 |
93.71 |
SE |
8 |
Carolina |
8 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
9 |
Tampa Bay |
8 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
SE |
10 |
NY Islanders |
6 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
11 |
NY Rangers |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
0.500 |
3.5 |
82.00 |
ATL |
12 |
Boston |
8 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0.375 |
4.5 |
61.50 |
NE |
13 |
Ottawa |
8 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0.375 |
4.5 |
61.50 |
NE |
14 |
Winnipeg |
7 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.357 |
4.5 |
58.57 |
SE |
15 |
Montreal |
7 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0.286 |
5 |
46.86 |
NE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Div |
1* |
Detroit |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0.833 |
0 |
136.67 |
CTL |
2* |
Los Angeles |
7 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
0.786 |
0 |
128.86 |
PAC |
3* |
Colorado |
8 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
0.750 |
0 |
123.00 |
NW |
4 |
Dallas |
8 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
0.750 |
0 |
123.00 |
PAC |
5 |
Chicago |
7 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
0.714 |
0.5 |
117.14 |
CTL |
6 |
Anaheim |
6 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
0.667 |
1 |
109.33 |
PAC |
7 |
Edmonton |
7 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
0.571 |
1.5 |
93.71 |
NW |
8 |
Vancouver |
8 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
0.563 |
1.5 |
92.25 |
NW |
9 |
Minnesota |
8 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
0.563 |
1.5 |
92.25 |
NW |
10 |
St. Louis |
8 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
CTL |
11 |
Nashville |
7 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
CTL |
12 |
San Jose |
6 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
PAC |
13 |
Phoenix |
6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.417 |
2.5 |
68.33 |
PAC |
14 |
Calgary |
7 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.357 |
3 |
58.57 |
NW |
15 |
Columbus |
8 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.063 |
5.5 |
10.25 |
CTL |
_ Continue reading
6
Oct
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: 2011-2012 nhl standings, NHL, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins, three point games. Leave a Comment
The standings as of the completion of all games on October 15, 2011.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
1 |
Washington |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
1.000 |
0 |
164.00 |
2 |
Toronto |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
1.000 |
0.5 |
164.00 |
3 |
Philadelphia |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
0.875 |
0.5 |
143.50 |
4 |
Buffalo |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0.750 |
1 |
123.00 |
5 |
NY Islanders |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0.750 |
1 |
123.00 |
6 |
New Jersey |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
0.750 |
1 |
123.00 |
7 |
Pittsburgh |
6 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
0.667 |
1 |
109.33 |
8 |
Florida |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0.667 |
1.5 |
109.33 |
9 |
Carolina |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
10 |
Tampa Bay |
5 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0.400 |
2.5 |
65.60 |
11 |
Boston |
5 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0.400 |
2.5 |
65.60 |
12 |
Montreal |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0.375 |
2.5 |
61.50 |
13 |
NY Rangers |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0.333 |
2.5 |
54.67 |
14 |
Ottawa |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0.200 |
3.5 |
32.80 |
15 |
Winnipeg |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.000 |
3.5 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
1 |
Detroit |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
1.000 |
0 |
164.00 |
2 |
Dallas |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
0.800 |
0.5 |
131.20 |
3 |
Colorado |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
0.800 |
0.5 |
131.20 |
4 |
Anaheim |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0.667 |
1.5 |
109.33 |
5 |
Los Angeles |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
6 |
Chicago |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
7 |
Nashville |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
8 |
Phoenix |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.625 |
1.5 |
102.50 |
9 |
Minnesota |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
0.600 |
1.5 |
98.40 |
10 |
Vancouver |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
11 |
St. Louis |
4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
12 |
Edmonton |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0.500 |
2 |
82.00 |
13 |
San Jose |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0.333 |
2.5 |
54.67 |
14 |
Calgary |
4 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0.250 |
3 |
41.00 |
15 |
Columbus |
5 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.100 |
4 |
16.40 |
_ Continue reading
10
Apr
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: NHL, NHL Standings, NHL Standings by Percentage, NHL Standings with Games Back, NHL Standings with non-shootout wins, NHL True Standings, non-shootout wins. 5 Comments
Updated after all games for the 2010-2011 regular season.
[Explanation below]
|
|
|
Eastern Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Magic |
1 |
x-Washington |
82 |
48 |
23 |
11 |
107 |
5 |
43 |
0.652 |
0 |
107.00 |
0 |
2 |
x-Philadelphia |
82 |
47 |
23 |
12 |
106 |
2 |
45 |
0.646 |
0.5 |
106.00 |
0 |
3 |
x-Boston |
82 |
46 |
25 |
11 |
103 |
2 |
44 |
0.628 |
2 |
103.00 |
0 |
4 |
x-Pittsburgh |
82 |
49 |
25 |
8 |
106 |
10 |
39 |
0.646 |
0.5 |
106.00 |
0 |
5 |
x-Tampa Bay |
82 |
46 |
25 |
11 |
103 |
6 |
40 |
0.628 |
2 |
103.00 |
0 |
6 |
x-Montreal |
82 |
44 |
30 |
8 |
96 |
3 |
41 |
0.585 |
5.5 |
96.00 |
0 |
7 |
x-Buffalo |
82 |
43 |
29 |
10 |
96 |
5 |
38 |
0.585 |
5.5 |
96.00 |
0 |
8 |
x-NY Rangers |
82 |
44 |
33 |
5 |
93 |
9 |
35 |
0.567 |
7 |
93.00 |
0 |
9 |
e-Carolina |
82 |
40 |
31 |
11 |
91 |
5 |
35 |
0.555 |
8 |
91.00 |
0 |
10 |
e-Toronto |
82 |
37 |
34 |
11 |
85 |
5 |
32 |
0.518 |
11 |
85.00 |
0 |
11 |
e-New Jersey |
82 |
38 |
39 |
5 |
81 |
3 |
35 |
0.494 |
13 |
81.00 |
0 |
12 |
e-Atlanta |
82 |
34 |
36 |
12 |
80 |
5 |
29 |
0.488 |
13.5 |
80.00 |
0 |
13 |
e-Ottawa |
82 |
32 |
40 |
10 |
74 |
2 |
30 |
0.451 |
16.5 |
74.00 |
0 |
14 |
e-NY Islanders |
82 |
30 |
39 |
13 |
73 |
4 |
26 |
0.445 |
17 |
73.00 |
0 |
15 |
e-Florida |
82 |
30 |
40 |
12 |
72 |
4 |
26 |
0.439 |
17.5 |
72.00 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
SW |
NSW |
Pctg. |
GB |
Pace |
Magic |
1 |
x-Vancouver |
82 |
54 |
19 |
9 |
117 |
4 |
50 |
0.713 |
0 |
117.00 |
0 |
2 |
x-San Jose |
82 |
48 |
25 |
9 |
105 |
5 |
43 |
0.640 |
6 |
105.00 |
0 |
3 |
x-Detroit |
82 |
47 |
25 |
10 |
104 |
4 |
43 |
0.634 |
6.5 |
104.00 |
0 |
4 |
x-Anaheim |
82 |
47 |
30 |
5 |
99 |
4 |
43 |
0.604 |
9 |
99.00 |
0 |
5 |
x-Nashville |
82 |
44 |
27 |
11 |
99 |
6 |
38 |
0.604 |
9 |
99.00 |
0 |
6 |
x-Phoenix |
82 |
43 |
26 |
13 |
99 |
5 |
38 |
0.604 |
9 |
99.00 |
0 |
7 |
x-Los Angeles |
82 |
46 |
30 |
6 |
98 |
10 |
36 |
0.598 |
9.5 |
98.00 |
0 |
8 |
x-Chicago |
82 |
44 |
29 |
9 |
97 |
6 |
38 |
0.591 |
10 |
97.00 |
0 |
9 |
e-Dallas |
82 |
42 |
29 |
11 |
95 |
5 |
37 |
0.579 |
11 |
95.00 |
0 |
10 |
e-Calgary |
82 |
41 |
29 |
12 |
94 |
9 |
32 |
0.573 |
11.5 |
94.00 |
0 |
11 |
e-St. Louis |
82 |
38 |
33 |
11 |
87 |
4 |
34 |
0.530 |
15 |
87.00 |
0 |
12 |
e-Minnesota |
82 |
39 |
35 |
8 |
86 |
3 |
36 |
0.524 |
15.5 |
86.00 |
0 |
13 |
e-Columbus |
82 |
34 |
35 |
13 |
81 |
5 |
29 |
0.494 |
18 |
81.00 |
0 |
14 |
e-Colorado |
82 |
30 |
44 |
8 |
68 |
6 |
24 |
0.415 |
24.5 |
68.00 |
0 |
15 |
e-Edmonton |
82 |
25 |
45 |
12 |
62 |
2 |
23 |
0.378 |
27.5 |
62.00 |
0 |
_ Continue reading
3
Apr
Posted by Naturallawyer in Uncategorized. Tagged: NHL 3-point game, NHL average record, NHL conference comparison, NHL Conference Standings, NHL league average. Leave a Comment
As of the end of the season 2010-2011.
A comparison of the conferences by total numbers:
|
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Avg. |
|
West |
1230 |
622 |
461 |
147 |
1391 |
0.565 |
92.7 |
|
East |
1230 |
608 |
472 |
150 |
1366 |
0.555 |
91.1 |
|
A comparison of the average team in each conference:
|
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
Pctg. |
|
West Avg. |
82.0 |
41.5 |
30.7 |
9.8 |
92.7 |
0.565 |
|
East Avg. |
82.0 |
40.5 |
31.5 |
10.0 |
91.1 |
0.555 |
|
A comparison of the 8th-best records in each conference (i.e. the pace required to make the playoffs):
CITY |
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
Pctg. |
|
Chicago |
82 |
44 |
29 |
9 |
97 |
0.591 |
|
NY Rangers |
82 |
44 |
33 |
5 |
93 |
0.567 |
|
Finally, the league-wide totals, and the league-wide average team:
|
GP |
W |
L |
OTL |
PTS |
Pctg. |
Pace Avg. |
Total |
2460 |
1230 |
933 |
297 |
2757 |
0.560 |
91.9 |
Avg. Team |
82.0 |
41.0 |
31.1 |
9.9 |
91.9 |
0.560 |
91.9 |
Explanation of the league-totals:
In other major sports leagues, .500 is always the average record. The above demonstrates how the “three point game” has artificially elevated the NHL average record. The average NHL team is much better than .500, and many more NHL teams can tell their fans they finished “above .500” even if they were well below the league average. You can compare your team to the average team above to see whether your team is truly above average (which is what .500 used to mean).